ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2024
Can status of superficial medial collateral ligament proximal tibial attachment predict progression of OA knee?
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation of Detachment of Proximal Tibia Superficial Medial Collateral Ligament and Medial Meniscus Extrusion with Knee Osteoarthritis.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to identify, whether knee OA progression is affected by the sMCL proximal tibial attachment status and probably is the first one trying to identify such association. Methods: 90 OA knees and 80 normal knees were evaluated using radiographs and MRI for severity of OA knee (K-L grade), sMCL length (L), distance of distal tibial attachment of sMCL from tibial articular surface (I), MCL ratio (L/I) and proximal tibial attachment of sMCL, attached or detached. Results: Mean age of the study population was 52.93 ± 19.52 years. 106 were female knees and 59 were male. Status of sMCL proximal tibial attachment had highly statistically significant negative correlation with severity of OA knee (p-value <0.001). The status of sMCL proximal tibial attachment shows statistically significant negative correlation with sMCL distal tibial attachment and significant positive correlation MCL ratio. But there was no significant correlation with sMCL length. Knees with lower MCL ratio (L/I) have significant higher grade of OA knee as they shows statistically significant negative correlation. Conclusion: Detached sMCL proximal tibial attachment is found to be a strong predictor of OA knee progression. Assessing the status of sMCL proximal tibial attachment will not only help the physician identifying medial stability of the knee, but also assist in planning therapy for the knee in question.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.