Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384669›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2024

Expert opinion on bleeding risk from invasive procedures in cirrhosis.

Alix Riescher-Tuczkiewicz, Stephen H Caldwell, Patrick S Kamath, Erica Villa, Pierre-Emmanuel Rautou, Bleeding in liver diseases investigators†, Bleeding in liver diseases investigators

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06908785 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Utility of ROTEM® for Risk Stratification of Post-Invasive Procedure Hemorrhage in Patients With Cirrhosis (CIR-ROTEM)

TypeobservationalSponsorInstituto de Investigación Marqués de ValdecillaRan2025 to 2028Enrolled330ConditionsCirrhosis, LiverArmsRotational thromboelastometry
NCT07437755 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Thrombelastometry-guided Blood Component Administration Versus Standard of Care in Patients With Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis Undergoing High Risk of Bleeding Invasive Procedures

TypeinterventionalSponsorGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and PharmacyRan2025 to 2026Enrolled116ConditionsLiver Cirrhosis With Acute DecompensationArmsBlood Products transfusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Safety of Anticoagulation When Undergoing Endoscopic Variceal Ligation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. An Automated Microfluidic System for Haemostasis Assessment in Cirrhosis With Thrombocytopenia.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alix Riescher-TuczkiewiczUniversité Paris-Cité, Inserm, Centre de recherche sur l'inflammation, UMR 1149, Paris, France.
Stephen H CaldwellDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Patrick S KamathDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Erica VillaGastroenterology Unit, Chimomo Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
Pierre-Emmanuel RautouUniversité Paris-Cité, Inserm, Centre de recherche sur l'inflammation, UMR 1149, Paris, France.
Bleeding in liver diseases investigators†
Bleeding in liver diseases investigators
Inserm · FRMayo Clinic · USUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Virginia Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Aims: Despite several recent international guidelines, no consensus exists on the bleeding risk nor haemostatic parameter thresholds that define the safety of invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to establish a position paper on the bleeding risk associated with invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis among the experts involved in various guidelines. Methods: All experts involved in recent guidelines on the management of invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis were invited to classify 80 procedures as "high risk" or "low risk" with respect to bleeding. Procedures were considered high risk when the estimated risk of major bleeding was 1.5% or more, or when even minor bleeding might lead to significant morbidity or death. The experts were also asked to choose safety thresholds for laboratory test values at which elective invasive procedures could be safely performed. The predetermined threshold considered as "consensus" was ≥75% agreement. Results: Fifty-two experts participated in the study. Out of 80 procedures, a consensus opinion was reached for 52 procedures (65%): 17 procedures were classified as "high risk", primarily interventional endoscopic procedures, percutaneous organ biopsies, or procedures involving the central nervous system; and 35 as "low risk", primarily "diagnostic" procedures. The lowest platelet counts at which performance of a low-risk procedure or a high-risk procedure/surgery were deemed acceptable were 30 × 10 Conclusions: This experience-based classification may be helpful to refine future study designs and to guide clinical decision making regarding invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis. Impact and implications: Several risk classifications and management guidelines for invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis have been proposed, but with conflicting recommendations. By providing a position paper, based on the opinion of a broad panel of experts, on the bleeding risk associated with 52 invasive procedures in patients with cirrhosis, this survey will help to provide a framework for future study design. The consensus on platelet count, international normalised ratio, fibrinogen and activated partial thromboplastin time identified in this survey will inform physicians regarding the laboratory test values considered acceptable by the experts prior to the performance of an elective invasive procedure in patients with cirrhosis.

Indexed as

anticoagulantaPTTbiopsycoagulationfibrinogenhaemorrhagehaemostasisINRplateletprocedural related bleeding

Identifiers

PMID38384669
PMCPMC10879786
OpenAlexW4389981031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.