ArticleCureus2024
Non-compliance of Spectacle Wear in School-Going Children With Refractive Errors.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Compliance with spectacle use among schoolchildren in a school health programme in Islamabad, Pakistan.International health · 2025Article
- Protective eyewear in children with one eye vision loss: compliance and trends.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- Pharmaceutical Prescribing Privileges for Optometrists to Combat Childhood Myopia in Singapore: Public Health Policy Review and Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Status of continuation of spectacle use among school children in selected districts of eastern Nepal: A retrospective study.Journal of optometryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Uncorrected refractive errors are the most common cause of avoidable visual impairment in children worldwide. The school screening of refractive errors is one of the most important initiatives outlined in WHO Vision 2020 targets for control of avoidable visual impairment in children. However, the benefit depends on the compliance of the spectacle worn by children. Objective To determine non-compliance of spectacle wear and its predisposing factors among school-going children in Lahore, Pakistan. Methods This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 200 school-going children (5-16 years), with spectacle prescription for at least the last six months studying in primary and secondary schools of Lahore, by using convenience sampling. We collected data with the help of a standardized, self-administered, close-ended questionnaire determining age, gender, class, and non-compliance and its reasons. Data were subjected to statistical evaluation using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 26; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY), and a chi-square test was applied to determine the statistical significance. p-value 0.05 was considered significant. Results Of the 200 children, 42 were boys, and 158 were girls, with a mean age of 12 years with a standard deviation of 2.6. The proportion of spectacle wear non-compliance was 19.5% (n=39). Children with non-compliance were more likely in the age group of 14-16 years (n=20{51.3%}; p=0.039). The main reasons for non-compliance were dislike to wear spectacles (28.2%), broken spectacles (23.1%), spectacles causing headache (20.5%), spectacles lost and parents' disapproval (20.5%), and peer pressure/teasing (15.4%). Significant difficulties faced while wearing spectacles were pressure on the nose due to worn-out nose pads (36.4%), pressure on ears causing pain in the temple and headache (34.1%), repeated cleaning of spectacles (29.5%), heavy spectacles (18.2%), excessive glare and pain in the eyes (12.5%), and improper fitting of spectacles (11.4%). Conclusions We found that non-compliance was more significant in school-going children aged 14-16 years and girls. The main reasons were unlikeness to wear, broken spectacles, headache, and spectacles lost. School children were not compliant because of many issues that should be addressed, and this information will be used for better eye care in school-going children with refractive errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.