ArticleHeliyon2024
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery for brainstem hemorrhage: A case-control study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of The Robotic Stereotactic Assistance for intracerebral hemorrhage; A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Pedal to the metal: accelerating intracerebral hemorrhage treatment with robotic-assisted surgery. A systematic review & meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of ROSA vs. conventional therapy for intracerebral hemorrhage.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Infratentorial Hemorrhages: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Technical Outcomes.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2026Review
- Stereotactic Hematoma Aspiration Versus Standard Treatment for Brainstem Hemorrhage-Updated Meta-Analysis, Meta-Regression, and Trial Sequential Analysis.Stroke research and treatment · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This work focused on investigating if robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery improved middle term vital outcome for primary brainstem hemorrhage (PBSH). Methods: This work obtained clinical data from patients with PBSH admitted from July 2019 to August 2021. All cases were classified as surgical or conservative treatment group. The general information, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, Glasgow outcome score (GOS), along with survival time in patients 60 days after robot-assisted surgery were recorded and analyzed. Results: A prospective analysis was performed on 82 cases meeting eligibility criteria, including 36 from surgical group whereas 46 from the conservative group. Sixty days after onset, the death rate was found to be 19.44% and 50.00% of surgical and conservative groups, separately (cases versus controls, P < 0.05). Furthermore, postoperative GOS and GCS scores of surgical group were significantly higher, and hydrocephalus was lower compared with conservative group. Central fever incidence did not exhibit any significant difference between two groups. Conclusion: Robot-assisted PBSH drainage may improve survivorship and reduce the occurrence of hydrocephalus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.