ArticleHeliyon2024
The development of prognostic gene markers associated with disulfidptosis in gastric cancer and their application in predicting drug response.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disulfidptosis: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Disulfidptosis-related LncRNA signatures in gastric cancer: regulation of MYH10-driven cytoskeletal remodeling and therapeutic implications.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Disulfidptosis in tumor progression.Cell death discovery · 2025Review
- Advances in the study of disulfidptosis in digestive tract tumors.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- A New Medical Evaluation for Gastric Cancer Patients to Increase the Success Rate of Immunotherapy: A 2024 Update.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Predictive Factors of Immunotherapy in Gastric Cancer: A 2024 Update.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is a malignancy known for its high fatality rate. Disulfidptosis, a potentially innovative therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment, has been proposed. Nevertheless, the specific involvement of disulfidptosis in the context of GC remains uncertain. Methods: The mRNA expression profiles were obtained from the TCGA and GEO databases. Univariate and LASSO Cox regression analyses were employed to identify differentially expressed genes and develop a risk model for disulfidptosis-related genes. The performance of the model was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curve, ROC curve, and nomogram. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine if the risk model could serve as an independent prognostic factor. The biological function of the identified genes was assessed through GO, KEGG, and GSEA analyses. The prediction of drug response was conducted employing the package "pRRophetic". Furthermore, gene expression was determined using qRT-PCR. Results: An eight-gene signature were identified and utilized to categorize patients into low- and high-risk groups. Survival, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Cox analyses provided clarification that these eight hub genes served as a favorable independent prognostic factor for patients with GC. A nomogram was constructed by integrating clinical parameters with the risk signatures, demonstrating high precision in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates. Additionally, drug sensitivity was different in the high-risk and low-risk groups, and the expression of three genes was verified by qRT-PCR. Conclusion: The prognostic risk model developed in this study demonstrates the potential to accurately forecast the prognosis of patients with GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.