Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384493›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Reimbursement in the Context of Precision Oncology Approaches in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Challenges and Experiences.

Constantin Pixberg, Markus Schulze, Lars Buschhorn, Jan Philip Suppelna, Andreas Mock, Mario Hlevnjak, Sabine Heublein, Eva Schumacher-Wulf, Andreas Schneeweiss

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Constantin PixbergMolecular Diagnostics Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus SchulzeMolecular Diagnostics Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lars BuschhornMolecular Diagnostics Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan Philip SuppelnaMolecular Diagnostics Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas MockDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mario HlevnjakMolecular Diagnostics Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sabine HeubleinDivision of Gynecological Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University of Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Eva Schumacher-WulfMamma Mia! Die Krebsmagazine, Cologne, Germany.
Andreas SchneeweissDivision of Gynecological Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University of Heidelberg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
National Center for Tumor Diseases · DEGerman Cancer Research Center · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Precision oncology programs using next-generation sequencing to detect predictive biomarkers are extending therapeutic options for patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Regularly, based on the recommendations of the interdisciplinary molecular tumor board (iMTB), an inclusion in a clinical trial is not possible. In this case, the German health insurance system allows for the application of reimbursement for an off-label drug use. Here, we describe the current challenges and our experience with reimbursement of molecular therapies in mBC. Methods: A total of 100 applications for reimbursement of off-label therapies recommended by an iMTB were filed for patients with mBC, of which 89 were evaluable for this analysis. The approval rate was correlated with the molecular level of evidence of the respective therapy according to the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) and European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets (ESCAT) classification as well as with pretreatment therapy lines. Findings: Overall, 53.9% (48/89) of reimbursement applications were approved. Applications for therapies based on level of evidence m1 (NCT classification), tier I and II (ESCAT classification) had a significantly and clinically relevant increased chance of reimbursement, while a greater number of previous treatment lines had no significantly increased chance of approval, though a trend of approval toward higher treatment lines was detectable. Interpretation: Currently, the German jurisdiction seems to aggravate the clinical implementation of clinically urgently needed molecular therapies.

Indexed as

Genomics-guided therapiesMetastatic breast cancerPrecision oncologyReimbursementTranslational oncology

Identifiers

PMID38384493
PMCPMC10878710
OpenAlexW4387542727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.