Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384487›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Final Results from RIBBIT: A Randomized Phase III Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Quality of Life in Patients with Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Receiving Ribociclib in Combination with Endocrine Therapy or Chemotherapy with or without Bevacizumab in the First-Line Setting.

Thomas Decker, Matthias Zaiss, Dunja Klein, Antje Hahn, Volker Hagen, Paul La Rosée, Rüdiger Liersch, Thomas Wolff, Beate Niemeier, Larissa E Hillebrand and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas DeckerStudienzentrum Onkologie, Ravensburg, Germany.
Matthias ZaissPraxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie und Hämatologie, Freiburg, Germany.
Dunja KleinDepartment of Medicine, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
Antje HahnKlinikum Mittelbaden, Baden-Baden, Germany.
Volker HagenSt. Johannes Hospital, Innere Medizin II, Dortmund, Germany.
Paul La RoséeSchwarzwald-Baar Klinikum, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany.
Rüdiger LierschGemeinschaftspraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Münster, Germany.
Thomas WolffOnkologie Lerchenfeld, Hamburg, Germany.
Beate NiemeierDepartment of Clinical Operations, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
Larissa E HillebrandDepartment of Medicine, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
Carolin LennartzDepartment of Biostatistics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
Marco ChiabudiniDepartment of Biostatistics, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
Fee BengschDepartment of Medicine, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
Martin IndorfDepartment of Clinical Operations, iOMEDICO, Freiburg, Germany.
Norbert MarschnerPraxis für interdisziplinäre Onkologie und Hämatologie, Freiburg, Germany.
Praxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie · DEIomedico (Germany) · DEKlinikum Mittelbaden · DERavensburg University of Cooperative Education · DESchwarzwald-Baar Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We investigated the efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients receiving either ribociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) or chemotherapy with/without bevacizumab as first-line treatment of metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BC). Patients and Methods: In this randomized, phase III study (RIBBIT), 38 patients diagnosed with metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative BC with presence of visceral metastases recruited between May 2018 and December 2020 were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either arm A (ribociclib + ET) or arm B (chemotherapy with/without bevacizumab) at 12 sites in Germany. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), patient-reported HRQoL, and frequency and type of adverse events. During study conduction, the recruitment rate was persistently and considerably lower than originally expected. Therefore, the recruitment was ended prematurely. The study was initially designed to enroll and randomize 158 patients. Results: Median [95% CI] PFS was 27.3 months [19.1 - NA, parameter not estimable] in arm A and 15.8 months [8.2 - NA] in arm B. Complete responses were achieved only in arm A ( Conclusion: Treatment of patients with visceral metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative BC with ribociclib in combination with ET showed a tendency toward a more favorable clinical outcome. Despite small numbers of patients and sites, this head-to-head comparison with chemotherapy supports the use of ribociclib with ET in patients with visceral metastasis at risk of fast disease progression.

Indexed as

Endocrine therapyFirst-line treatmentMetastatic hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancerRibociclibTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID38384487
PMCPMC10878705
OpenAlexW4390034011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.