Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384485›Full record

ArticleBreast care (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Long-Term Follow-Up of High-Risk Breast Lesions at Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy without Subsequent Surgical Resection.

Constanze Elfgen, Zsuzsanna Varga, Katrin Breitling, Eliane Pauli, Daniela Schwegler-Guggemos, Gert Kampmann, Rahel A Kubik-Huch, Cornelia Leo, Domenico Lepori, Martin Sonnenschein and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast care (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Constanze ElfgenBreast-Center Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Zsuzsanna VargaDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Katrin BreitlingBreast Center, Kantonsspital Schaffhausen, Schaffhausen, Switzerland.
Eliane PauliBreast Center, Kantonsspital Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland.
Daniela Schwegler-GuggemosDepartment of Radiology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
Gert KampmannCentro di Radiologia e Senologia Luganese, Lugano, Switzerland.
Rahel A Kubik-HuchDepartment of Radiology, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland.
Cornelia LeoBreast Center, Kantonsspital Baden, Baden, Switzerland.
Domenico LeporiImagerie du flon, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Martin SonnenscheinRadiology Section, Breast Center Lindenhofgruppe AG, Bern, Switzerland.
Christoph TauschBreast-Center Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Simone SchradingDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Kantonsspital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Breast Center · CHKantonsspital Baden · CHCentre d'Imagerie BioMedicale · CHClinica Luganese Moncucco · CHKantonsspital Aarau · CHKantonsspital Frauenfeld · CHLuzerner Kantonsspital · CHSpitäler Schaffhausen · CHUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: B3-lesions of the breast are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, associated with a higher risk of breast cancer. Recent studies show a low upgrade rate into malignancy after subsequent open surgical excision (OE) of most B3-lesions when proven by vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB). However, there is a lack of long-term follow-up data after VAB of high-risk lesions. The primary aim of this study was to demonstrate whether follow-up of B3 lesions is a beneficial and reliable alternative to OE in terms of long-term outcome. The secondary aim was to identify patient and lesion characteristics of B3 lesions for which OE is still necessary. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study was conducted at 8 Swiss breast centers between 2010 and 2019. A total of 278 women (mean age: 53.5 ± 10.7 years) with 286 B3-lesions who had observation only and who had at least 24 months of follow-up were included. Any event during follow-up (ductal carcinoma in situ [DCIS], invasive cancer, new B3-lesion) was systematically recorded. Data from women who had an event during follow-up were compared with those who did not. The results for the different B3 lesions were analyzed using the Results: The median follow-up interval was 59 months (range: 24-143 months) with 52% (148/286) having a follow-up of more than 5 years. During follow-up, in 42 women, 44 suspicious lesions occurred, with 36.4% (16/44) being invasive cancer and 6.8% (3/44) being DCIS. Thus, 6.6% (19/286) of all women developed malignancy during follow-up after a median follow-up interval of 6.5 years (range: 31-119 months). The initial histology of the B3 lesion influenced the subsequent occurrence of a malignant lesion during follow-up ( Conclusion: With a low risk of <6% of developing malignancy, VAB followed by long-term follow-up is a safe alternative to OE for most B3-lesions. A higher malignancy rate only occurred in ADH (24%). Based on our results, radiological follow-up should be bilateral, preferable using the technique of initial diagnosis. As we observed a late peak (6-7 years) of breast malignancies after B3-lesions, follow-up should be continued for a longer period (>10 years). Knowledge of these long-term outcome results will be helpful in making treatment decisions and determining the optimal radiological follow-up interval.

Indexed as

B3 lesionCore needle biopsyLesion of uncertain malignant potentialStereotactic biopsyUltrasound-guided biopsyVacuum-assisted biopsy

Identifiers

PMID38384485
PMCPMC10878709
OpenAlexW4387542943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.