Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384481›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2024

A unified model for cross-modal plasticity and skill acquisition.

Woon Ju Park, Ione Fine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Spatial Mapping of Activity Changes across Sensory Areas Following Visual Deprivation in Adults.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Woon Ju ParkDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Ione FineDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Funding

The Effects of Visual DeprivationR01EY014645 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FINE, IONE · 2004 to 2021
$5.3M
Learning to see again: biological constraints on cortical plasticity and the implications for sight restoration technologiesR01EY031312 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BOYNTON, GEOFFREY M, FINE, IONE · 2021 to 2025
$2.0M
Anatomical, Neural, and Computational Constraints On Sensory Cross-Modal Plasticity Following Early BlindnessR00EY034546 · NEI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Woon Ju Park · 2024 to 2026
$737k
Anatomical, neural, and computational constraints on sensory cross-modal plasticity following early blindnessK99EY034546 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PARK, WOON JU · 2023 to 2024
$253k
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY034546NEI NIH HHS R00 EY034546NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014645NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, cross-modal plasticity following early blindness has been largely studied in the context of visual deprivation. However, more recently, there has been a shift in focus towards understanding cross-modal plasticity from the perspective of skill acquisition: the striking plasticity observed in early blind individuals reflects the extraordinary perceptual and cognitive challenges they solve. Here, inspired by two seminal papers on skill learning (the "cortical recycling" theory) and cross-modal plasticity (the "metamodal" hypothesis) respectively, we present a unified hypothesis of cortical specialization that describes how shared functional, algorithmic, and structural constraints might mediate both types of plasticity.

Indexed as

blindnesscross-modalcultural recyclingdevelopmentneuronal recyclingplasticityskill acquisitionvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID38384481
PMCPMC10879418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.