SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy optimizes reproductive outcomes in recurrent reproductive failure: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Causes of embryo implantation failure: A systematic review and metaanalysis of procedures to increase embryo implantation potential.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: From Risk Prediction to ART Translation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- PGT-A versus expectant management for fertile patients with recurrent pregnancy loss and prior aneuploidy: a dual-center, real-world study of 5-year cumulative pregnancy outcomes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Observational
- Correlation between AMH levels and embryonic aneuploidy rate in PGT-A patients: a retrospective study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Review
- Immunological Factors in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: Mechanisms, Controversies, and Emerging Therapies.Biology · 2025Review
- Advanced strategies for single embryo selection in assisted human reproduction: A review of clinical practice and research methods.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- FSH/LH co-stimulation in Advanced Maternal Age (AMA) and hypo-responder patients - Arabian gulf delphi consensus group.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Recurrent reproductive failure (RRF) is a common pregnancy complication, imposing great physical, emotional and financial burden for the suffered couples. The leading cause of RRF is believed to be aneuploid embryo, which could be solved by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in theory. With molecular genetic development, PGT-A based on comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS) procedures and blastocyst biopsy is widely applied in clinical practice. However, its effects in RRF were not defined yet. Methods: A systematic bibliographical search was conducted without temporal limits up to June, 2023. Studies about the effects of PGT-A based on CCS procedures and blastocyst biopsy in RRF were included. Results: Twenty studies about the effects of PGT-A based on CCS procedures and blastocyst biopsy in RRF were included. It revealed that PGT-A could optimise the reproductive outcomes of RRF sufferers, especially in those with advanced age. However, in patients with multiple occurrences of pregnancy losses, the benefits of PGT-A were limited. Discussion: More randomized controlled trials with large sample size are required to evaluate the benefits of PGT-A in RRF sufferers and identify which population would benefit the most.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.