Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384382›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2024

Feasibility of neurosonography in CHD-fetuses and controls in a clinical tertiary setting.

Sheila M Everwijn, Jiska F van Bohemen, Fenna A Jansen, Sylke J Steggerda, Aalbertine K Teunissen, Monique C Haak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sheila M EverwijnDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Jiska F van BohemenDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Fenna A JansenDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Sylke J SteggerdaLeiden University Medical Center, Willem Alexander Children's Hospital, Department of Neonatology, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Aalbertine K TeunissenDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Monique C HaakDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Diagnosis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Ultrasonographic examination is the first-tier test to detect abnormal development of central nervous system (CNS). In optimal conditions, neurosonography can detect all important hallmarks of CNS development. It is, however, not known how the performance of this modality is in a routine setting. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of neurosonography in a time-limited routine setting. Study design: We have performed a prospective study in which we have included a group of pregnant women carrying a fetus with an isolated congenital heart defect (CHD), and a control group of fetuses without structural anomalies. We have performed basic neurosonography examination according to the guideline 'how to perform a basic screening examination of the CNS', published by the international society of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology in both groups. In all these examinations, 9 brain structures were scored in 3 different planes, by researchers that were blinded for group allocation. A sufficient neurosonogram was performed when 7 or more out of 9 CNS structures were clearly visible during the off-line scoring of the examination. Results: A total of 574 neurosonographic examinations were performed in 151 fetuses, 90 in the CHD-group and 61 in the control group. A sufficient neurosonogram could be performed in 79% (234/294) of cases in a clinical setting (CHD cases) and in 90% (253/280) of control pregnancies. Higher maternal BMI (>30), maternal age, fetal cephalic position, fetal gender and placental position did not significantly influence neurosonography scores. Conclusion: In clinical setting, basic fetal neurosonography can be sufficiently performed in the majority of cases. This was not significantly influenced by maternal or fetal factors. The optimal gestational age for neurosonography is between 22 and 34 weeks.

Indexed as

Congenital heart defectsNeurosonographyUltrasound performance

Identifiers

PMID38384382
PMCPMC10879662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.