Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384338›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Tolerability of vortioxetine compared to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in older adults with major depressive disorder (VESPA): a randomised, assessor-blinded and statistician-blinded, multicentre, superiority trial.

Giovanni Ostuzzi, Chiara Gastaldon, Mauro Tettamanti, Massimo Cartabia, Igor Monti, Andrea Aguglia, Eugenio Aguglia, Francesco Bartoli, Camilla Callegari, Andrea Canozzi and 26 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03779789 (Assessing Tolerability and Efficacy of Vortioxetine Versus SSRIs in Elderly Patients With Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03779789 phase4completednot on this map

Assessing Tolerability and Efficacy of Vortioxetine Versus SSRIs in Elderly Patients With Depression: a Pragmatic, Multicenter, Open-label, Parallel-group, Superiority, Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata VeronaRan2019 to 2023Enrolled362ConditionsMajor Depressive DisorderArmsVortioxetine, Sertraline, citalopram, Escitalopram, Paroxetine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. VortioxetineCurrent neuropharmacology · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. New Antidepressant Development in the Treatment of Depression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanni OstuzziDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Chiara GastaldonDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Mauro TettamantiIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Massimo CartabiaIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Igor MontiIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Andrea AgugliaDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), Section of Psychiatry, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Eugenio AgugliaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Francesco BartoliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Camilla CallegariDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Section of Psychiatry, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Andrea CanozziDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Elvira Anna CarbonePsychiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Giuseppe CarràDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Rosangela CarusoDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Simone CavallottiDepartment of Mental Health and Addiction, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Stefania ChiappiniDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. D'Annunzio", Chieti, Italy.
Fabrizio ColasanteDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Beatrice CompriDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Armando D'AgostinoDepartment of Mental Health and Addiction, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Pasquale De FazioPsychiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Renato de FilippisPsychiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Matteo GariIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Marta IelminiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Section of Psychiatry, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Gianmarco IngrossoDepartment of Mental Health and Addiction, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Silvia MammarellaDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Giovanni MartinottiDepartment of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University "G. D'Annunzio", Chieti, Italy.
Alessandro RodolicoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Rita RonconeDepartment of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Enrico SterziPharmacy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy.
Lorenzo TarsitaniDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Elisa TibertoDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Liliana TodiniDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco AmaddeoDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Barbara D'AvanzoIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
VESPA Study Group
Angelo BarbatoIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Corrado BarbuiDepartment of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
University of Verona · ITMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITUniversity of Milan · ITMagna Graecia University · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Insubria · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is prevalent and disabling among older adults. Standing on its tolerability profile, vortioxetine might be a promising alternative to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in such a vulnerable population. Methods: We conducted a randomised, assessor- and statistician-blinded, superiority trial including older adults with MDD. The study was conducted between 02/02/2019 and 02/22/2023 in 11 Italian Psychiatric Services. Participants were randomised to vortioxetine or one of the SSRIs, selected according to common practice. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events after six months was the primary outcome, for which we aimed to detect a 12% difference in favour of vortioxetine. The study was registered in the online repository clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03779789). Findings: The intention-to-treat population included 179 individuals randomised to vortioxetine and 178 to SSRIs. Mean age was 73.7 years (standard deviation 6.1), and 264 participants (69%) were female. Of those on vortioxetine, 78 (44%) discontinued the treatment due to adverse events at six months, compared to 59 (33%) of those on SSRIs (odds ratio 1.56; 95% confidence interval 1.01-2.39). Adjusted and per-protocol analyses confirmed point estimates in favour of SSRIs, but without a significant difference. With the exception of the unadjusted survival analysis showing SSRIs to outperform vortioxetine, secondary outcomes provided results consistent with a lack of substantial safety and tolerability differences between the two arms. Overall, no significant differences emerged in terms of response rates, depressive symptoms and quality of life, while SSRIs outperformed vortioxetine in terms of cognitive performance. Interpretation: As opposed to what was previously hypothesised, vortioxetine did not show a better tolerability profile compared to SSRIs in older adults with MDD in this study. Additionally, hypothetical advantages of vortioxetine on depression-related cognitive symptoms might be questioned. The study's statistical power and highly pragmatic design allow for generalisability to real-world practice. Funding: The study was funded by the Italian Medicines Agency within the "2016 Call for Independent Drug Research".

Indexed as

Adverse eventsMajor depressive disorderOlder adultsSerotonin selective reuptake inhibitorsTolerabilityVortioxetine

Identifiers

PMID38384338
PMCPMC10879669
OpenAlexW4391868372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.