Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384332›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2024

Transcranial magnetic stimulation input-output curve slope differences suggest variation in recruitment across muscle representations in primary motor cortex.

Lari M Koponen, Miles Martinez, Eleanor Wood, David L K Murphy, Stefan M Goetz, Lawrence G Appelbaum, Angel V Peterchev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lari M KoponenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Miles MartinezDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Eleanor WoodDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
David L K MurphyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Stefan M GoetzDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Lawrence G AppelbaumDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Angel V PeterchevDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.

Funding

Impact of Timing, Targeting, and Brain State on rTMS of Human and Non-Human PrimatesRF1MH114253 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SOMMER, MARC A · 2017 to 2017
$3.0M
Transcranial magnetic stimulation with enhanced focality and depth (fdTMS)RF1MH114268 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PETERCHEV, ANGEL V · 2017 to 2017
$1.6M
NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH114253NIMH NIH HHS RF1 MH114268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurement of the input-output (IO) curves of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used to assess corticospinal excitability and motor recruitment. While IO curves have been used to study disease and pharmacology, few studies have compared the IO curves across the body. This study sought to characterize IO curve parameters across the dominant and non-dominant sides of upper and lower limbs in healthy participants. Laterality preferences were assessed in eight healthy participants and IO curves were measured bilaterally for the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), biceps brachii (BB), and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles. Results show that FDI has lower motor threshold than BB which is, in turn, lower than TA. In addition, both BB and TA have markedly shallower logarithmic IO curve slopes from small to large MEP responses than FDI. After normalizing these slopes by their midpoints to account for differences in motor thresholds, which could result from geometric factors such as the target depth, large differences in logarithmic slopes remain present between all three muscles. The differences in slopes between the muscles could not be explained by differences in normalized IO curve spreads, which relate to the extent of the cortical representation and were comparable across the muscles. The IO curve differences therefore suggest muscle-dependent variations in TMS-evoked recruitment across the primary motor cortex, which should be considered when utilizing TMS-evoked MEPs to study disease states and treatment effects.

Indexed as

input–output curveIO curveMEPmotor evoked potentialTMStranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38384332
PMCPMC10879434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.