Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384316›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Factors influencing the use of epidural labor analgesia: a cross-sectional survey analysis.

Wei Li, Na Wu, Shuangqiong Zhou, Weijia Du, Zhendong Xu, Zhiqiang Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei Li *Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Na Wu *Nursing Department of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Shuangqiong ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Weijia DuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Zhendong XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Zhiqiang LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Gynecologic Oncology, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to explore the personal and organizational factors influencing the lack of implementation of epidural labor analgesia (ELA). Methods: This study was conducted at the Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China. A total of 451 women who underwent vaginal delivery without ELA between 8 October 2021 and 30 March 2022, were included. A questionnaire was used to collect the relevant data. We derived and validated the variable, without ELA, by using binary logistic regression analysis. Results: Of the total 451 included, 355 (78.7%) initially preferred ELA, whereas 96 (21.3%) rejected it directly. Five variables were validated ( Conclusion: The corresponding training should be provided to the medical staff to identify women at high risk of rejecting ELA during the prenatal examination process using a questionnaire, then provide them with knowledge regarding ELA, so that ELA can benefit more mothers. Additionally, the existing organizational factor should be addressed in order to efficiently provide ELA services to mothers. Clinical trial registration: This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Chi CTR 2000034625) on July 12, 2020.

Indexed as

epidural labor analgesialabor painorganizational factorspersonal factorsvaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID38384316
PMCPMC10880097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.