Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384245›Full record

ReviewJournal of biosciences2024

Recent developments in gene therapy research in India.

Ruchita Selot, Arkasubhra Ghosh

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biosciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00979238 phase1completednot on this map

An Open Label Dose-Escalation Study Of A Self Complementary Adeno-Associated Viral Vector (scAAV 2/8-LP1-hFIXco) For Gene Transfer in Hemophilia B

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt. Jude Children's Research HospitalRan2010 to 2026Enrolled14ConditionsHemophilia BArmsGene Transfer, scAAV2/8-LP1-hFIXco
NCT00999609 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A Safety and Efficacy Study in Subjects With Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) Using Adeno-Associated Viral Vector to Deliver the Gene for Human RPE65 to the Retinal Pigment Epithelium (RPE) [AAV2-hRPE65v2-301]

TypeinterventionalSponsorSpark Therapeutics, Inc.Ran2012 to 2030Enrolled31ConditionsInherited Retinal Dystrophy Due to RPE65 Mutations, Leber Congenital AmaurosisArmsAAV2-hRPE65v2,voretigene neparvovec-rzyl
NCT02122952 phase1completednot on this map

Phase I Gene Transfer Clinical Trial for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 1 Delivering AVXS-101

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis Gene TherapiesRan2014 to 2017Enrolled15ConditionsSpinal Muscular Atrophy 1ArmsAVXS-101
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruchita SelotGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bengaluru 560099, India.
Arkasubhra Ghosh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inherited genetic disorders are progressive in nature and lead to organ dysfunction or death in severe cases. At present, there are no permanent treatment options for >95% of inherited disorders. Different modes of inheritance, type of gene(s) involved, and population-based variations add further complexity to finding suitable cures for approximately 400 million patients worldwide. Gene therapy is a very promising molecular technique for the treatment of rare genetic disorders. Gene therapy functions on the basis of restoration, replacement, inhibition, and, most recently, editing of gene(s) to rescue the disease phenotype. Recent reports show that increasing numbers of gene therapy clinical trials are using viral vectors (64.2%) when compared with non-viral vectors. Rapid development of efficient viral vector systems like the adeno-associated virus (AAV) and lentivirus has significantly contributed to this progress. Notably, AAV-mediated gene therapy has shown high potential for genetic disease treatment as evident from recent clinical trials for the eye (NCT00999609), blood (NCT00979238), and neuro-muscular systems (NCT02122952). Safety and efficacy are the two most critical features required for vector(s) to qualify for pre-clinical and clinical trial approval. The process of clinical-grade vector production, evaluation, and approvals for gene therapy products requires significant technological development, knowledge enhancement, and large financial investments. Additionally, trained manpower is required to meet the demands for constant technical innovation. These factors together contribute towards exorbitant prices for every dose of a gene therapy product and thus pose a challenge for the gene therapy field. The Indian subcontinent has traditionally lagged behind North America, Europe, Japan, and others in gene therapy clinical trials due to factors like inadequate industrial-scientific infrastructure, lack of accessible and organized patient databases, low financial investments, etc. However, over the last decade, increasing awareness of rare diseases, and international approvals of gene therapies such as Luxturna, Zolgensma, Hemgenix, etc., have spurred gene therapy development in India as well. In view of these advances, this article outlines gene therapy research, regulatory processes, and the launch of gene therapy clinical trials in India in the context of major developments worldwide. We briefly describe ongoing gene therapy research across Indian organizations and the nascent gene therapy product manufacturing. Further, we highlight the various initiatives from the medical and patient community to avail rehabilitation and gene therapy options. We briefly discuss the roles of regulatory agencies and guidelines for gene therapy clinical trials in India. We anticipate that this concise review will highlight the promise of gene therapy for the large population of rare disease patients in India.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansIndiaLentivirus

Identifiers

PMID38384245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.