Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384180›Full record

Trial reportGut and liver2024

The Effect of Tegoprazan on the Treatment of Endoscopic Resection-Induced Artificial Ulcers: A Multicenter, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study.

Byung-Wook Kim, Jong Jae Park, Hee Seok Moon, Wan Sik Lee, Ki-Nam Shim, Gwang Ho Baik, Yun Jeong Lim, Hang Lak Lee, Young Hoon Youn, Jun Chul Park and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut and liver, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Therapeutic potential ofPharmaceutical biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Byung-Wook KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2290-4954
Jong Jae ParkDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4642-5405
Hee Seok MoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8806-2163
Wan Sik LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8021-6228
Ki-Nam ShimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4004-6292
Gwang Ho BaikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1419-7484
Yun Jeong LimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3279-332X
Hang Lak LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2825-3216
Young Hoon YounDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0071-229X
Jun Chul ParkDepartment of Gastroenterology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8018-0010
In-Kyung SungDepartment of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3848-5571
Hyunsoo ChungDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5159-357X
Jeong Seop MoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5909-8159
Gwang Ha KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University College of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9721-5734
Su Jin HongDigestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2012-0360
Hyuk Soon ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4343-6950
Yonsei University · KRChonnam National University Hwasun Hospital · KRChungnam National University · KRDongguk University Ilsan Hospital · KREwha Womans University · KRHallym University · KRHanyang University Medical Center · KRInje University Seoul Paik Hospital · KRKonkuk University Medical Center · KRKorea University · KRPusan National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRSoonchunhyang University · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: : Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that has beneficial effects on acid-related disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux and peptic ulcer diseases. This study aimed to validate the effect of tegoprazan on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced artificial ulcers. Methods: : Patients from 16 centers in Korea who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasia were enrolled. After ESD, pantoprazole was administered intravenously for 48 hours. The patients were randomly allocated to either the tegoprazan or esomeprazole group. Tegoprazan 50 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg were administered for 4 weeks, after which gastroscopic evaluation was performed. If the artificial ulcer had not healed, the same dose of tegoprazan or esomeprazole was administered for an additional 4 weeks, and a gastroscopic evaluation was performed. Results: : One hundred sixty patients were enrolled in this study. The healing rates of artificial ulcers at 4 weeks were 30.3% (23/76) and 22.1% (15/68) in the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups, respectively (p=0.006). At 8 weeks after ESD, the cumulative ulcer healing rates were 73.7% (56/76) and 77.9% (53/68) in the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups, respectively (p=0.210). Delayed bleeding occurred in two patients in the tegoprazan group (2.6%) and in one patient in the esomeprazole group (1.5%). Other adverse events were negligible in both groups. Conclusions: : Tegoprazan showed similar effects on post-ESD artificial ulcer healing in comparison with esomeprazole.

Indexed as

Benzene DerivativesEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionImidazolesStomach NeoplasmsStomach UlcerEsomeprazoleHumansProton Pump InhibitorsUlcerBenzene DerivativesEsomeprazoleImidazolesProton Pump InhibitorstegoprazanEndoscopic resectionEndoscopic submucosal dissectionGastric neoplasiaMulticenter prospective randomized studyTegoprazan

Identifiers

PMID38384180
PMCPMC10938149
OpenAlexW4392054691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.