Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38384139›Full record

ReviewNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2024

Nuclear actin filaments - a historical perspective.

Maria Kristha Fernandez, Molika Sinha, Mia Zidan, Malte Renz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Macrophage Actin Cytoskeleton in Chronic Rejection.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026
    Review
  3. Recent advances in nuclear actin research.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria Kristha FernandezGynecologic Oncology Division, School of Medicine Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Molika SinhaGynecologic Oncology Division, School of Medicine Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Mia ZidanGynecologic Oncology Division, School of Medicine Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Malte RenzGynecologic Oncology Division, School of Medicine Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9535-7560

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The view on nuclear filaments formed by non-skeletal β-actin has significantly changed over the decades. Initially, filamentous actin was observed in amphibian oocyte nuclei and only under specific cell stress conditions in mammalian cell nuclei. Improved labeling and imaging technologies have permitted insights into a transient but microscopically apparent filament network that is relevant for chromatin organization, biomechanics of the mammalian cell nucleus, gene expression, and DNA damage repair. Here, we will provide a historical perspective on the developing insight into nuclear actin filaments.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonCell NucleusActinsAnimalsCytoskeletonMammalsOocytesActinsBiomechanics of cell nucleusDNA damage repairnuclear actin filamentsnucleocytoplasmic shuttlingsignaling and gene expression

Identifiers

PMID38384139
PMCPMC10885181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.