SynthesisCell and tissue banking2024
Efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cells in the treatment of type 1 diabetes: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Cell and tissue banking, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conditioned medium from adipose mesenchymal stromal cells stimulated with pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) mitigates RINm5F pancreatic β-cell dysfunction.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Human mesenchymal stem/stromal cell based-therapy in diabetes mellitus: experimental and clinical perspectives.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cells in the treatment of type 1 diabetes. Articles about the effects of mesenchymal stromal cells for T1D were retrieved in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases up to July 2023. Additional relevant studies were manually searched through citations. HbA1c, FBG, PBG, insulin requirement and C-peptide were assessed. The risk of bias was evaluated with the ROB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tools. Six RCTs and eight nRCTs were included. Of the 14 studies included, two evaluated BM-MSCs, three evaluated UC-MSCs, five evaluated AHSCT, two evaluated CB-SCs, and two evaluated UC-SCs plus aBM-MNCs. At the end of follow-up, ten studies found that mesenchymal stromal cells improved glycemic outcomes in T1D, while the remaining four studies showed no significant improvement. Findings support the positive impacts observed from utilizing mesenchymal stromal cells in individuals with T1D. However, the overall methodological quality of the identified studies and findings is heterogeneous, limiting the interpretation of the therapeutic benefits of mesenchymal stromal cells in T1D. Methodically rigorous research is needed to further increase credibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.