Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38383880›Full record

ArticlePsychometrika2024

DIF Analysis with Unknown Groups and Anchor Items.

Gabriel Wallin, Yunxiao Chen, Irini Moustaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychometrika, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabriel WallinDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Umeå, Sweden.
Yunxiao ChenDepartment of Statistics, London School of Economics and Political Science, Columbia House, Room 5.16 Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK. y.chen186@lse.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7215-2324
Irini MoustakiDepartment of Statistics, London School of Economics and Political Science, Columbia House, Room 5.16 Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK.

Funding

Vetenskapsrådet 2020-06484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring fairness in instruments like survey questionnaires or educational tests is crucial. One way to address this is by a Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis, which examines if different subgroups respond differently to a particular item, controlling for their overall latent construct level. DIF analysis is typically conducted to assess measurement invariance at the item level. Traditional DIF analysis methods require knowing the comparison groups (reference and focal groups) and anchor items (a subset of DIF-free items). Such prior knowledge may not always be available, and psychometric methods have been proposed for DIF analysis when one piece of information is unknown. More specifically, when the comparison groups are unknown while anchor items are known, latent DIF analysis methods have been proposed that estimate the unknown groups by latent classes. When anchor items are unknown while comparison groups are known, methods have also been proposed, typically under a sparsity assumption - the number of DIF items is not too large. However, DIF analysis when both pieces of information are unknown has not received much attention. This paper proposes a general statistical framework under this setting. In the proposed framework, we model the unknown groups by latent classes and introduce item-specific DIF parameters to capture the DIF effects. Assuming the number of DIF items is relatively small, an

Indexed as

PsychometricsComputer SimulationEducational MeasurementHumansModels, StatisticalSurveys and Questionnairesdifferential item functioninglassolatent class analysislatent DIFmeasurement invariance

Identifiers

PMID38383880
PMCPMC11062998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.