Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38383819›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2024

Intra- and inter- rater reliability of the face‑to‑face assessment and tele‑assessment of performance-based tests in older adults.

Gulsah Ozsoy, Kevser Aksoy

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07402499 (Validity and Reliability of an Immersive Virtual Reality Adaptation of the Timed Up and Go Test in Individuals With Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07402499 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Validity and Reliability of an Immersive Virtual Reality Adaptation of the Timed Up and Go Test in Individuals With Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain

TypeobservationalSponsorSelcuk UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled65ConditionsChronic Low Back Pain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gulsah OzsoyDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey. fzt.gulsah@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5678-771X
Kevser AksoyDepartment of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0004-2464-6014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to assess Timed-Up and Go (TUG), Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (5xSST), and 4-Meter Walk Test (4MWT) intra- and inter-rater reliability between face-to-face and tele-assessment tools in older adults.

methodsA total of 54 older adults (aged ≥ 65 years) were included in the study. Measurements (TUG, 5xSST, and 4MWT) were carried out face-to-face and tele-assessment. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Altman plots was used determine intra- and inter-rater reliability.

resultsThe mean age of the participants, 53% of whom were female, was 69.59 years. Inter-rater reliability between face-to-face and tele-assessment was as following: excellent for TUG (ICC = 0.931) and 5STS (ICC = 0.908), and good for 4MWT (ICC = 0.803). In addition, intra-rater reliability between the two tele-assessments was excellent for all tests. The ICC values for TUG, 5STS, and 4MWT were 0.973, 0.948, and 0.934, respectively.

conclusionTo conclude, the TUG, 5xSST, and 4MWT seem to be reliable tools of tele-assessment in older adults. These practical assessment tools can be used in home settings for older adults as tele-health interventions.

Indexed as

Geriatric AssessmentTelemedicineAgedAged, 80 and overExercise TestFemaleHumansMaleObserver VariationPostural BalanceReproducibility of ResultsWalk TestOlder adultsPerformance-based testsTele‑assessmentTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID38383819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.