Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38383816›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2024

3.0-T MR-guided transgluteal in-bore-targeted prostate biopsy under local anesthesia in patients without rectal access: a single-institute experience and review of literature.

Kaustav Bera, Nikhil Ramaiya, Raj Mohan Paspulati, Dean Nakamoto, Sree Harsha Tirumani

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kaustav BeraDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. Kaustav.Bera@uhhospitals.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9831-6000
Nikhil RamaiyaDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Raj Mohan PaspulatiDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
Dean NakamotoDepartment of Radiology, Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Sree Harsha TirumaniDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
University Hospitals of Cleveland · USLouis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center · USMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the technique and evaluate the performance of MRI-guided transgluteal in-bore-targeted biopsy of the prostate gland under local anesthesia in patients without rectal access.

methodsTen men (mean age, 69 (range 57-86) years) without rectal access underwent 13 MRI-guided transgluteal in-bore-targeted biopsy of the prostate gland under local anesthesia. All patients underwent mp-MRI at our institute prior to biopsy. Three patients had prior US-guided transperineal biopsy which was unsuccessful in one, negative in one, and yielded GG1 (GS6) PCa in one. Procedure time, complications, histopathology result, and subsequent management were recorded.

resultsMedian interval between rectal surgery and presentation with elevated PSA was 12.5 years (interquartile range (IQR) 25-75, 8-36.5 years). Mean PSA was 11.9 (range, 4.8 -59.0) ng/ml and PSA density was 0.49 (0.05 -3.2) ng/ml/ml. Distribution of PI-RADS v2.0/2.1 scores of the targeted lesions were PI-RADS 5-3; PI-RADS 4-6; and PI-RADS 3-1. Mean lesion size was 1.5 cm (range, 1.0-3.6 cm). Median interval between MRI and biopsy was 5.5 months (IQR 25-75, 1.5-9 months). Mean procedure time was 47.4 min (range, 29-80 min) and the number of cores varied between 3 and 5. Of the 13 biopsies, 4 yielded clinically significant prostate cancer (csPca), with a Gleason score ≥ 7, 1 yielded insignificant prostate cancer (Gleason score = 6), 7 yielded benign prostatic tissue, and one was technically unsuccessful. 3/13 biopsies were repeat biopsies which detected csPCa in 2 out of the 3 patients. None of the patients had biopsy-related complication. Biopsy result changed management to radiation therapy with ADT in 2 patients with the rest on active surveillance.

conclusionMRI-guided transgluteal in-bore-targeted biopsy of the prostate gland under local anesthesia is feasible in patients without rectal access.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, InterventionalProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overAnesthesia, LocalHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProstateProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific AntigenLocal anesthesiaMR guidanceProstate biopsyProstate cancerTrasngluteal in-bore-targeted biopsy

Identifiers

PMID38383816
PMCPMC10954944
OpenAlexW4392017464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.