Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38383806›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

Auto-segmentation of Adult-Type Diffuse Gliomas: Comparison of Transfer Learning-Based Convolutional Neural Network Model vs. Radiologists.

Qi Wan, Jisoo Kim, Clifford Lindsay, Xin Chen, Jing Li, J Bryan Iorgulescu, Raymond Y Huang, Chenxi Zhang, David Reardon, Geoffrey S Young and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Qi WanDepartment of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jisoo KimDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Clifford LindsayImage Processing and Analysis Core (iPAC), Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Xin ChenSchool of Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jing LiDepartment of Radiology, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Henan Cancer Hospital), Zhengzhou, China.
J Bryan IorgulescuMolecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Department of Hematopathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Raymond Y HuangDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Chenxi ZhangDigital Medical Research Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
David ReardonCenter for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Geoffrey S YoungDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. gsyoung@bwh.harvard.edu.
Lei QinDepartment of Imaging, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. lei_qin@dfci.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6708-1285
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USCenter for Neuro-Oncology · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USGuangzhou First People's Hospital · CNHarvard University · USShanghai Medical College of Fudan University · CNThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USZhengzhou University · CN

Funding

Training Program in Nervous System TumorsK12CA090354 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI PLOTKIN, SCOTT R · 2001 to 2025
$16.3M
Computer aided diagnosis of cancer metastases in the brainR01LM012434 · NLM · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI YOUNG, GEOFFREY · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
A New Informatics Approach for Detection of Cerebrovascular AbnormalitiesR01LM013891 · NLM · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI YOUNG, GEOFFREY · 2022 to 2025
$1.5M
Targeted Neural Text Summarization of Electronic Medical Records to Improve Imaging DiagnosticsR01LM013772 · NLM · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI WALLACE, BYRON CASEY, YOUNG, GEOFFREY · 2022 to 2024
$1.0M
National Institutes of Health award R01LM012434National Institutes of Health award R01LM013772National Institutes of Health award R01LM013891NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090354NCI NIH HHS K12CA090354NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012434NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013772NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmentation of glioma is crucial for quantitative brain tumor assessment, to guide therapeutic research and clinical management, but very time-consuming. Fully automated tools for the segmentation of multi-sequence MRI are needed. We developed and pretrained a deep learning (DL) model using publicly available datasets A (n = 210) and B (n = 369) containing FLAIR, T2WI, and contrast-enhanced (CE)-T1WI. This was then fine-tuned with our institutional dataset (n = 197) containing ADC, T2WI, and CE-T1WI, manually annotated by radiologists, and split into training (n = 100) and testing (n = 97) sets. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was used to compare model outputs and manual labels. A third independent radiologist assessed segmentation quality on a semi-quantitative 5-scale score. Differences in DSC between new and recurrent gliomas, and between uni or multifocal gliomas were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. Semi-quantitative analyses were compared using the chi-square test. We found that there was good agreement between segmentations from the fine-tuned DL model and ground truth manual segmentations (median DSC: 0.729, std-dev: 0.134). DSC was higher for newly diagnosed (0.807) than recurrent (0.698) (p < 0.001), and higher for unifocal (0.747) than multi-focal (0.613) cases (p = 0.001). Semi-quantitative scores of DL and manual segmentation were not significantly different (mean: 3.567 vs. 3.639; 93.8% vs. 97.9% scoring ≥ 3, p = 0.107). In conclusion, the proposed transfer learning DL performed similarly to human radiologists in glioma segmentation on both structural and ADC sequences. Further improvement in segmenting challenging postoperative and multifocal glioma cases is needed.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningGliomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerAdultFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedRadiologistsBraTSDeep learningGliomaSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID38383806
PMCPMC11300742
OpenAlexW4392015811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.