Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38383756›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Inhibition of epigenetic and cell cycle-related targets in glioblastoma cell lines reveals that onametostat reduces proliferation and viability in both normoxic and hypoxic conditions.

Darja Lavogina, Mattias Kaspar Krõlov, Hans Vellama, Vijayachitra Modhukur, Valentina Di Nisio, Helen Lust, Kattri-Liis Eskla, Andres Salumets, Jana Jaal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Darja LavoginaInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, L. Puusepa 8, 50406, Tartu, Estonia. darja.lavogina@ut.ee.
Mattias Kaspar KrõlovChair of Bioorganic Chemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Hans VellamaDepartment of Physiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Vijayachitra ModhukurCompetence Centre on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.
Valentina Di NisioDepartment of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
Helen LustInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, L. Puusepa 8, 50406, Tartu, Estonia.
Kattri-Liis EsklaDepartment of Physiology, Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Andres SalumetsCompetence Centre on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.
Jana JaalInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, L. Puusepa 8, 50406, Tartu, Estonia. jana.jaal@ut.ee.
University of Tartu · EEKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

Estonian Ministry of Education and Research and the Estonian Research Council PRG1076Estonian Ministry of Education and Research and the Estonian Research Council PRG454Estonian Ministry of Education and Research and the Estonian Research Council PUT1077European Regional Development Fund 2014-2020.4.01.15-0012Horizon 2020 innovation grant ERIN, grant no. EU952516Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Estonia PMVCMHO
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The choice of targeted therapies for treatment of glioblastoma patients is currently limited, and most glioblastoma patients die from the disease recurrence. Thus, systematic studies in simplified model systems are required to pinpoint the choice of targets for further exploration in clinical settings. Here, we report screening of 5 compounds targeting epigenetic writers or erasers and 6 compounds targeting cell cycle-regulating protein kinases against 3 glioblastoma cell lines following incubation under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. The viability/proliferation assay indicated that PRMT5 inhibitor onametostat was endowed with high potency under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions in cell lines that are strongly MGMT-positive (T98-G), weakly MGMT-positive (U-251 MG), or MGMT-negative (U-87 MG). In U-251 MG and U-87 MG cells, onametostat also affected the spheroid formation at concentrations lower than the currently used chemotherapeutic drug lomustine. In T98-G cell line, treatment with onametostat led to dramatic changes in the transcriptome profile by inducing the cell cycle arrest, suppressing RNA splicing, and down-regulating several major glioblastoma cell survival pathways. Further validation by immunostaining in three cell lines confirmed that onametostat affects cell cycle and causes reduction in nucleolar protein levels. In this way, inhibition of epigenetic targets might represent a viable strategy for glioblastoma treatment even in the case of decreased chemo- and radiation sensitivity, although further studies in clinically more relevant models are required.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaCell CycleCell DivisionCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationEpigenesis, GeneticHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProtein-Arginine N-MethyltransferasesPRMT5 protein, humanProtein-Arginine N-Methyltransferases

Identifiers

PMID38383756
PMCPMC10881536
OpenAlexW4392004817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.