Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38383749›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

The validation of a Japanese version of the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOG-Q).

Seira Taniguchi, Kohei Marumoto, Yuta Kajiyama, Gajanan Revankar, Michiko Inoue, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Rika Kayano, Eiji Mizuta, Ryuichi Takahashi, Emi Shirahata and 5 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Seira TaniguchiDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. seira.taniguchi.pt@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5297-7716
Kohei MarumotoHyogo Prefectural Rehabilitation Hospital at Nishi-Harima, 1-7-1 Koto, Shingu-Cho, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan.
Yuta KajiyamaDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Gajanan RevankarDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Michiko InoueHyogo Prefectural Rehabilitation Hospital at Nishi-Harima, 1-7-1 Koto, Shingu-Cho, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan.
Hiroshi YamamotoHyogo Prefectural Rehabilitation Hospital at Nishi-Harima, 1-7-1 Koto, Shingu-Cho, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan.
Rika KayanoHyogo Prefectural Rehabilitation Hospital at Nishi-Harima, 1-7-1 Koto, Shingu-Cho, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan.
Eiji MizutaHyogo Prefectural Rehabilitation Hospital at Nishi-Harima, 1-7-1 Koto, Shingu-Cho, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan.
Ryuichi TakahashiHyogo Prefectural Rehabilitation Hospital at Nishi-Harima, 1-7-1 Koto, Shingu-Cho, Tatsuno, Hyogo, Japan.
Emi ShirahataDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Chizu SaekiDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Tatsuhiko OzonoDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yasuyoshi KimuraDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Kensuke IkenakaDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Hideki MochizukiDepartment of Neurology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London JP21K17524Japan Society for the Promotion of Science London JP23KJ1539
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (NFOG-Q) and investigate its validity and reliability.

methodsAfter translating the NFOG-Q according to a standardised protocol, 56 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) were administered it. Additionally, the MDS-UPDRS parts II and III, Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) stage, and number of falls over 1 month were evaluated. Spearman's correlation coefficients (rho) were used to determine construct validity, and Cronbach's alpha (α) was used to examine reliability.

resultsThe interquartile range of the NFOG-Q scores was 10.0-25.3 (range 0-29). The NFOG-Q scores were strongly correlated with the MDS-UPDRS part II, items 2.12 (walking and balance), 2.13 (freezing), 3.11 (freezing of gait), and 3.12 (postural stability) and the postural instability and gait difficulty score (rho = 0.515-0.669), but only moderately related to the MDS-UPDRS item 3.10 (gait), number of falls, disease duration, H&Y stage, and time of the Timed Up-and-Go test (rho = 0.319-0.434). No significant correlations were observed between age and the time of the 10-m walk test. The internal consistency was excellent (α = 0.96).

conclusionsThe Japanese version of the NFOG-Q is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the severity of freezing in patients with PD.

Indexed as

Gait Disorders, NeurologicParkinson DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslatingFreezing of gaitMeasurementParkinson’s diseaseRating scaleValidation

Identifiers

PMID38383749
PMCPMC11176215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.