ArticleScientific reports2024
Serum ferritin predicted prognosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum ferritin as a non-invasive prognostic biomarker in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Ferritin as a novel predictive index for nasopharyngeal carcinoma survival and therapeutic efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens.World journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Elevated serum ferritin (SF) levels have been associated with poor prognosis in various cancer types, but its impact on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains unclear. This retrospective study analyzed clinical data from 252 non-metastatic NPC patients admitted to Hainan General Hospital between January 2014 and May 2016. SF levels were measured using the chemiluminescence method. Patients were categorized into low, medium, and high-level SF groups based on tertile median SF levels. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models. The overall survival rates of the entire patient cohort at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years were 95.2%, 85.7%, 76.2%, and 68.9% respectively. The high-level SF group (SF > 164.00 ng/mL) had significantly worse overall survival (83.1 vs 96.3 months, P = 0.023) and progression-free survival (77.8 vs 93.3 months, P = 0.019) compared to the low-level SF group. Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that high SF levels, along with T3/T4 staging and N3 staging, were independent risk factors for poor prognosis. In conclusion, high SF levels are associated with shorter overall survival and progression-free survival in NPC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.