Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38383673›Full record

ArticleThe ultrasound journal2024

Evaluation of point-of-care ultrasound training among healthcare providers: a pilot study.

Dima Tareq Al-Absi, Mecit Can Emre Simsekler, Mohammed Atif Omar, Hatem Soliman-Aboumarie, Noha Abou Khater, Tahir Mehmood, Siddiq Anwar, Deanne Tomie Kashiwagi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ultrasound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dima Tareq Al-AbsiDepartment of Management Science and Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6945-3732
Mecit Can Emre SimseklerDepartment of Management Science and Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1555-5012
Mohammed Atif OmarDepartment of Management Science and Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Hatem Soliman-AboumarieDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Noha Abou KhaterDepartment of Medicine, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, P.O.Box 11001, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Tahir MehmoodDepartment of Medicine, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, P.O.Box 11001, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Siddiq AnwarDepartment of Medicine, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, P.O.Box 11001, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. sanwar@ssmc.ae.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0051-2423
Deanne Tomie KashiwagiDepartment of Medicine, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, P.O.Box 11001, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research Operations ManagementKhalifa University of Science, Technology and Research RCII-2019-002- Research Center for Digital Supply Chain
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) has become prevalent across a variety of clinical settings. Many healthcare professionals have started getting hands-on training. To evaluate the effectiveness of such training programs, this study aimed to assess a 4 day POCUS training course on healthcare providers' skills and knowledge acquisition. A secondary objective of this study is to gain valuable insights into the degree of perception, attitude, interest levels and perceived barriers of medical providers performing POCUS.

methodsThis is a prospective cohort study performed on healthcare providers in an integrated healthcare facility in Abu Dhabi undergoing the POCUS training course in February 2022. Course participants took a pre-course survey to evaluate their baseline knowledge, skills, confidence, perception, and interest in POCUS. The same survey was repeated immediately post-course. In total, seven healthcare professionals responded to the survey with a response rate of 53.8%. All data and information gathered were used to understand the effectiveness of POCUS training and gain insights into the degree of perception, interest and preparedness of POCUS among healthcare professionals in practice.

resultsOur results demonstrated that the brief POCUS course was effective in improving POCUS skills, knowledge and confidence amongst in-practice healthcare providers from varying medical specialties. The median skill score increased from 25% pre-course to 50% post-course. There is a notable increase in all skills scores after the POCUS training course with the greatest change in scores seen for adjusting 'gain and depth of image (54.84%), assessing VeXUS score (52.38%) and evaluating lung congestion (50%). The study also provided valuable insights into the perception, attitude, interest and potential barriers of POCUS implementation. Although significant barriers to POCUS are present including the lack of POCUS curriculum, what is challenging is lack of expertise and skills to perform POCUS. Therefore, medical providers must acquire prespecified skills to fully utilize POCUS effectively.

conclusionThe study confirmed the effectiveness of short POCUS training in improving the skills, knowledge and confidence of medical providers in practice. Healthcare professionals can master POCUS skills and techniques and gain confidence through brief training courses.

Indexed as

Future of workHealthcarePOCUSPoint-of-care ultrasonographySkills acquisitionTraining

Identifiers

PMID38383673
PMCPMC10881927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.