Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38383590›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Lead isotopes of prehistoric copper tools define metallurgical phases in Late Neolithic and Eneolithic Italy.

Gilberto Artioli, Ivana Angelini, Caterina Canovaro, Günther Kaufmann, Igor Maria Villa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gilberto ArtioliDipartimento di Geoscienze, Università di Padova, via Gradenigo 6, 35131, Padova, Italy. gilberto.artioli@unipd.it.
Ivana AngeliniDepartment of Cultural Heritage: Archaeology and History of Art, Cinema and Music, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Caterina CanovaroDipartimento di Geoscienze, Università di Padova, via Gradenigo 6, 35131, Padova, Italy.
Günther KaufmannMuseo Archeologico dell'Alto Adige/Südtiroler Archäologiemuseum, Bolzano/Bozen, Italy.
Igor Maria VillaInstitut für Geologie, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

Azienda Musei Provinciali/Betrieb Landesmuseen CUP H56C18000170005Museo Archeologico dell'Alto Adige/Südtiroler Archäologiemuseum CUP H53C17000200005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diffuse presence of small copper ore deposits in the Alpine area, mostly exploited since Late Medieval times, led most scholars to assume that these deposits may actually be active much earlier and that many of the circulating prehistoric metal objects found in the area were produced with local copper sources. This assumption was recently validated for the Recent Bronze Age through the use of lead isotope tracers, and well supported by the archaeometallurgical evidences found in the South-Eastern Alps. However, the scarcity of available lead isotope data for pre-Bronze Age metals precluded to date the reconstruction of the metal flow through the Late Neolithic and Eneolithic (or Copper Age). Based on 49 new analyses of important archaeological objects from the Alpine region, the Po River Valley and Central Italy, mostly axes dated from the Late Neolithic to the Late Eneolithic, here we show that the diffusion of copper in Northern Italy (approximately 4500-2200 BC) includes three major periods of metal use and/or production, each related to specific ore sources. The South Alpine copper was massively used only starting from the middle of the 3rd millennium BC, in connection or slightly earlier than the Beaker event.

Indexed as

Alpine regionCopper AgeCopper metal provenanceEneolithicNorthern Italy

Identifiers

PMID38383590
PMCPMC10881475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.