ArticleScientific reports2024
Correction of high-rate motion for photoacoustic microscopy by orthogonal cross-correlation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acquisition-inspired motion artifact modeling and degradation-consistent diffusion restoration in photoacoustic microscopy.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- In vivo photoacoustic tomography of porcine abdominal organs using Fabry-Pérot sensing integrated platform.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Photoacoustic imaging is a promising technology for in vivo imaging. However, its imaging performance can be hampered by motion artifacts, especially when dealing with high-rate motion. In this paper, we propose an orthogonal motion correction method that utilizes cross-correlation along orthogonal scan directions to extract accurate motion displacements from the photoacoustic data. The extracted displacements are then applied to remove artifacts and compensate for motion-induced distortions. Phantom experiments demonstrate that the proposed method can extract the motion information and the structural similarity index measurement after correction is increased by 26.5% and 11.2% compared to no correction and the previous correction method. Then the effectiveness of our method is evaluated in vivo imaging of a mouse brain. Our method shows a stable and effective performance under high-rate motion. The high accuracy of the motion correction method makes it valuable in improving the accuracy of photoacoustic imaging.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.