Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38383513›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Learning representations for image-based profiling of perturbations.

Nikita Moshkov, Michael Bornholdt, Santiago Benoit, Matthew Smith, Claire McQuin, Allen Goodman, Rebecca A Senft, Yu Han, Mehrtash Babadi, Peter Horvath and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Leveraging AI for cell biology discovery.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nikita MoshkovHUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 62 Temesvári krt, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
Michael BornholdtBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA.
Santiago BenoitBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA.
Matthew SmithBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA.
Claire McQuinBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA.
Allen GoodmanBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA.
Rebecca A SenftBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA.
Yu HanBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA.
Mehrtash BabadiBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA.
Peter HorvathHUN-REN Biological Research Centre, 62 Temesvári krt, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-4492-1798
Beth A CiminiBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9640-9318
Anne E CarpenterBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1555-8261
Shantanu SinghBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3150-3025
Juan C CaicedoBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main St, Cambridge, MA, 02141, USA. juan.caicedo@wisc.edu.

Funding

Center for Open Bioimage AnalysisP41GM135019 · NIGMS · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI CARPENTER, ANNE E., CIMINI, BETH · 2020 to 2024
$6.9M
Extracting rich information from biological imagesR35GM122547 · NIGMS · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI Anne E. Carpenter · 2017 to 2026
$6.2M
National Science Foundation (NSF) 2348683NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM135019NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring the phenotypic effect of treatments on cells through imaging assays is an efficient and powerful way of studying cell biology, and requires computational methods for transforming images into quantitative data. Here, we present an improved strategy for learning representations of treatment effects from high-throughput imaging, following a causal interpretation. We use weakly supervised learning for modeling associations between images and treatments, and show that it encodes both confounding factors and phenotypic features in the learned representation. To facilitate their separation, we constructed a large training dataset with images from five different studies to maximize experimental diversity, following insights from our causal analysis. Training a model with this dataset successfully improves downstream performance, and produces a reusable convolutional network for image-based profiling, which we call Cell Painting CNN. We evaluated our strategy on three publicly available Cell Painting datasets, and observed that the Cell Painting CNN improves performance in downstream analysis up to 30% with respect to classical features, while also being more computationally efficient.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID38383513
PMCPMC10881515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.