Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38383506›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2024

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus conventional CPR in cardiac arrest: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Christopher Jer Wei Low, Ryan Ruiyang Ling, Kollengode Ramanathan, Ying Chen, Bram Rochwerg, Tetsuhisa Kitamura, Taku Iwami, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Yohei Okada

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
49.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Determining Access for a City-Wide Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) Initiative Using Geospatial Analysis.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Christopher Jer Wei Low *Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National Unviersity Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Ryan Ruiyang Ling *Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National Unviersity Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Kollengode RamanathanYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National Unviersity Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Ying ChenGenome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Bram RochwergDivision of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Tetsuhisa KitamuraDepartment of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Taku IwamiPreventive Services, Graduate School of Medicine, School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Marcus Eng Hock OngHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Yohei OkadaPreventive Services, Graduate School of Medicine, School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. yohei_ok@duke-nus.edu.sg.
National University Health System · SGKyoto University · JPAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGImpact · CAOsaka University · JPSingapore General Hospital · SG

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP23K16253
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) may reduce mortality and improve neurological outcomes in patients with cardiac arrest. We updated our existing meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis to further evaluate ECPR compared to conventional CPR (CCPR).

methodsWe searched three international databases from 1 January 2000 through 1 November 2023, for randomised controlled trials or propensity score matched studies (PSMs) comparing ECPR to CCPR in both out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). We conducted an updated random-effects meta-analysis, with the primary outcome being in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included short- and long-term favourable neurological outcome and survival (30 days-1 year). We also conducted a trial sequential analysis to evaluate the required information size in the meta-analysis to detect a clinically relevant reduction in mortality.

resultsWe included 13 studies with 14 pairwise comparisons (6336 ECPR and 7712 CCPR) in our updated meta-analysis. ECPR was associated with greater precision in reducing overall in-hospital mortality (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50-0.79, high certainty), to which the trial sequential analysis was concordant. The addition of recent studies revealed a newly significant decrease in mortality in OHCA (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.84). Re-analysis of relevant secondary outcomes reaffirmed our initial findings of favourable short-term neurological outcomes and survival up to 30 days. Estimates for long-term neurological outcome and 90-day-1-year survival remained unchanged.

conclusionsWe found that ECPR reduces in-hospital mortality, improves neurological outcome, and 30-day survival. We additionally found a newly significant benefit in OHCA, suggesting that ECPR may be considered in both IHCA and OHCA.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHeart ArrestHumansOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestCardiac arrestCardiopulmonary resuscitationExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID38383506
PMCPMC10882798
OpenAlexW4392091242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.