Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38383443›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Exploring the current state of clinical and practical teaching in obstetrics and gynecology in the era of competency-based education: a nationwide survey among German teaching coordinators.

Bastian Meyer, Fabian Riedel, Niklas Amann, Anna Graf, Antonia Stuehrenberg, Viktoria Ritter, Markus Wallwiener, Sabine Heublein, Florian Recker, Martin Weiss and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Medical education in obstetrics and gynecology: A global update from 2025.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bastian Meyer *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Fabian Riedel *Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Niklas AmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Anna GrafDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Antonia StuehrenbergDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Viktoria RitterDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Markus WallwienerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Halle University, Halle, Germany.
Sabine HeubleinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Florian ReckerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Bonn University Hospital, Bonn, Germany.
Martin WeissDepartment of Women's Health, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Maximilian RiedelDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany. maximilian.riedel@mri.tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) is an essential medical field that focuses on women's health. Universities aim to provide high-quality healthcare services to women through comprehensive education of medical students. In Germany, medical education is undergoing a phase of restructuring towards the implementation of competency-based learning. The objective of the current survey was to gain insights into the teaching methods, resources, and challenges at German medical universities in the field OB/GYN. This aims to document the current state of medical education and derive potential suggestions for improvements in the era of competency-based learning. The survey was conducted with teaching coordinators from the majority of OB/GYN departments at German universities.

methodsA questionnaire was sent to the teaching coordinators in all 41 OB/GYN departments at German university hospitals. The survey was delivered via email with a link to an online survey platform.

resultsThe study received 30 responses from 41 universities. Differences were observed in the work environment of teaching coordinators concerning release from clinical duties for teaching purposes and specialized academic training. Overall, medical education and student motivation were perceived positively, with noticeable gaps, particularly in practical gynecological training. Deficiencies in supervision and feedback mechanisms were also evident. Subfields such as urogynecology and reproductive medicine appear to be underrepresented in the curriculum, correlating with poorer student performance. E-learning was widely utilized and considered advantageous.

conclusionThe present study provides valuable insights into the current state of medical education in OB/GYN at German universities from the perspective of teaching experts. We highlight current deficits, discuss approaches to overcome present obstacles, and provide suggestions for improvement.

Indexed as

GynecologyObstetricsCompetency-Based EducationCurriculumFemaleHumansPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesCompetency-based educationCurriculum developmentGerman universitiesMedical curriculumMedical educationNKLMTeaching coordinators

Identifiers

PMID38383443
PMCPMC10880315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.