Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38383393›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2024

Leveraging artificial intelligence to advance implementation science: potential opportunities and cautions.

Katy E Trinkley, Ruopeng An, Anna M Maw, Russell E Glasgow, Ross C Brownson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katy E TrinkleyDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. katy.trinkley@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2041-7404
Ruopeng AnBrown School and Division of Computational and Data Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Anna M MawAdult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Russell E GlasgowDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Ross C BrownsonPrevention Research Center, Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Nutrition Obesity Research CenterP30DK056341 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Dominic N Reeds · 1999 to 2026
$30.2M
Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
Washington University Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control (WU-ISCCC)P50CA244431 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C, COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2019 to 2023
$8.0M
Pragmatic Implementation Science Approaches to Assess and Enhance Value of Cancer Prevention and Control in Rural Primary CareP50CA244688 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI GLASGOW, RUSSELL E · 2019 to 2023
$4.9M
The Retain Study: Recruiting and Engaging with Technology Older Adults to Increase NeurocognitionU48DP006395 · DP · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C · 2018 to 2023
$4.8M
Mentored Education for Dissemination and Implementation Science (MEDIS) ProgramR25DK123008 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C, HAIRE-JOSHU, DEBRA · 2020 to 2024
$1.1M
Personalizing Clinical Decision Support for Heart Failure Treatment to Clinicians' NeedsK23HL161352 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Katy E Trinkley · 2022 to 2026
$869k
CDC HHS U48DP006395NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006395NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244431NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244688NCI NIH HHS P50CA244688NHLBI NIH HHS 1K23HL161352NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL161352NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056341NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK056341NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK092950NIDDK NIH HHS R25 DK123008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe field of implementation science was developed to address the significant time delay between establishing an evidence-based practice and its widespread use. Although implementation science has contributed much toward bridging this gap, the evidence-to-practice chasm remains a challenge. There are some key aspects of implementation science in which advances are needed, including speed and assessing causality and mechanisms. The increasing availability of artificial intelligence applications offers opportunities to help address specific issues faced by the field of implementation science and expand its methods. MAIN TEXT: This paper discusses the many ways artificial intelligence can address key challenges in applying implementation science methods while also considering potential pitfalls to the use of artificial intelligence. We answer the questions of "why" the field of implementation science should consider artificial intelligence, for "what" (the purpose and methods), and the "what" (consequences and challenges). We describe specific ways artificial intelligence can address implementation science challenges related to (1) speed, (2) sustainability, (3) equity, (4) generalizability, (5) assessing context and context-outcome relationships, and (6) assessing causality and mechanisms. Examples are provided from global health systems, public health, and precision health that illustrate both potential advantages and hazards of integrating artificial intelligence applications into implementation science methods. We conclude by providing recommendations and resources for implementation researchers and practitioners to leverage artificial intelligence in their work responsibly.

conclusionsArtificial intelligence holds promise to advance implementation science methods ("why") and accelerate its goals of closing the evidence-to-practice gap ("purpose"). However, evaluation of artificial intelligence's potential unintended consequences must be considered and proactively monitored. Given the technical nature of artificial intelligence applications as well as their potential impact on the field, transdisciplinary collaboration is needed and may suggest the need for a subset of implementation scientists cross-trained in both fields to ensure artificial intelligence is used optimally and ethically.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImplementation ScienceEvidence-Based PracticeHumansArtificial intelligenceImplementation scienceLearning health systemsTeam scienceTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID38383393
PMCPMC10880216
OpenAlexW4391995689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.