ArticleCancer cell international2024
RNA-binding proteins signature is a favorable biomarker of prognosis, immunotherapy and chemotherapy response for cervical cancer.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advancement in inflammatory biomarkers for cervical cancer diagnosis and therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Identification and validation of a 9-RBPs-related gene signature associated with prognosis and immune infiltration in bladder cancer based on bioinformatics analysis and machine learning.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- RNA binding proteins (RBPs) on genetic stability and diseases.Global medical genetics · 2025Review
- Genome-wide profiling of a prognostic RNA-binding protein signature in esophageal cancer.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- RNA-binding protein transcripts as potential biomarkers for detecting Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and for predicting its progression to Cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma (CESC) still present a huge threaten to women's health, especially the local advanced patients. Hence, developing more effectiveness prognostic signatures is urgently needed. This study constructed and verified a robust RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) related signature through a series of bioinformatics methods and explored the biological function of hub RBP in vitro experiments. As a result, the 10 RBPs signature was successfully established and could act as an independent prognostic biomarker in CESC patients, which displayed the highest sensitivity and specificity in prognosis prediction compared with other clinicopathological parameters. The risk model also presented good performance in risk stratification among CESC patients. Besides, a nomogram was constructed based on pathological stage and the risk signature and exhibited satisfactory accuracy in prognosis prediction. Functional enrichment indicated that the risk signature mainly participated in immune-related pathways and cancer-related pathways, and the infiltration level of immune cells and immune checkpoints showed a significantly higher degree in low-risk patients compared with high-risk patients. Notably, the 10 RBPs signature act as a novel biomarker in immunotherapy and chemotherapy response. In addition, PRPF40B was selected as hub RBP and its transcription and translation levels were obviously increased in CESC tissues, as well as Hela and Siha cells. Knockdown of PRPF40B inhibits the proliferation, migration and invasion of Hela and Siha cells in vitro. In conclusion, our research provides a noticeable strategy in prognostic prediction among CESC patients, which may illuminate the prospect of CESC patients' clinical outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.