Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38383115›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

Differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia long-term follow up and prognostic factors: An analysis of a large historical cohort.

Niccolò Gallio, Mario Preti, Ronald W Jones, Fulvio Borella, Linn Woelber, Luca Bertero, Sara Urru, Leonardo Micheletti, Federica Zamagni, Federica Bevilacqua and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vulvar Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Scientific Progress and Impacts to Pathology Practice.International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Niccolò GallioDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science University Hospital, S. Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3041-1201
Mario PretiDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science University Hospital, S. Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1573-3114
Ronald W JonesRetired Clinical Professor, Auckland, New Zealand.
Fulvio BorellaDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science University Hospital, S. Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Linn WoelberDepartment of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Luca BerteroDepartment of Medical Sciences, Pathology Unit, City of Health and Science University Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9887-7668
Sara UrruDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Leonardo MichelettiDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science University Hospital, S. Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Federica ZamagniEmilia-Romagna Cancer Registry, Romagna Cancer Institute, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) Dino Amadori, Forlì, Italy.
Federica BevilacquaDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science University Hospital, S. Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Pierluigi TondoDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science University Hospital, S. Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Benedetta PollanoDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science University Hospital, S. Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Paola CassoniDepartment of Medical Sciences, Pathology Unit, City of Health and Science University Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Chiara BenedettoDivision of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Surgical Sciences, City of Health and Science University Hospital, S. Anna Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Ospedale Sant'Anna · ITDepartment of Medical Sciences · BYGreenlane Clinical Centre · NZIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDifferentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) is a high-risk preinvasive vulvar lesion and precursor of human papillomavirus-independent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Due to its rarity, literature data on its malignant potential are scant. The aim of the study is to assess the risk of developing VSCC in patients surgically treated for dVIN not associated with VSCC (solitary dVIN) and the risk of VSCC recurrence in patients treated for dVIN associated with VSCC (dVIN-VSCC) at first diagnosis. MATERIAL AND

methodsA historical cohort study was performed in a northern Italy referral center for vulvar neoplasms. All consecutive women surgically treated for histologically confirmed dVIN from 1994 to 2021 were collected. Primary outcome was cancer risk or recurrent cancer risk, secondary outcomes were risk factors associated with VSCC development or recurrence. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate cancer risk or recurrent cancer risk differences and uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses to identify risk factors associated with VSCC development in solitary dVIN and recurrence of dVIN-VSCC.

resultsSeventy-six patients with dVIN at preoperative biopsy were included: at excisional specimens 44 were solitary dVIN and 32 were dVIN-VSCC. The absolute risk of VSCC development after solitary dVIN treatment was 43.2% with median time to to VSCC diagnosis of 25.4 months (range 3.5-128.0 months). VSCC recurrence absolute risk in treated dVIN-VSCC patients was 31.3% with median time to VSCC recurrence of 52.9 months (range 6.5-94.8 months). At uni- and multivariate regression analyses, only compliant topical ultrapotent corticosteroid treatment after solitary dVIN excision showed an ability to prevent VSCC development. No protective effect by corticosteroid treatment was shown for VSCC recurrence in dVIN-VSCC patients. Smoking was associated with higher cancer recurrence risk in dVIN-VSCC patients on both uni- and multivariate regression analyses.

conclusionsPatients with dVIN have a high risk of developing both primary and recurring VSCC. Early recognition, long-term follow up, and compliant ultrapotent topical corticosteroid treatment are recommended.

Indexed as

Carcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Squamous CellNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalVulvar NeoplasmsAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansItalyMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk Factorsdifferentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasiaoncologytopical corticosteroid therapyvulvar cancervulvar intraepithelial neoplasia

Identifiers

PMID38383115
PMCPMC11103129
OpenAlexW4392775052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.