Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38382957›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Operation-specific risk of postoperative nausea: a cross-sectional study comparing 72 procedures.

Marcus Komann, Yvonne Rabe, Thomas Lehmann, Johannes Dreiling, Claudia Weinmann, Peter Kranke, Winfried Meißner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marcus KomannDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany marcus.komann@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3637-7067
Yvonne RabeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Thomas LehmannCenter for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Johannes DreilingDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Claudia WeinmannDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Peter KrankeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Winfried MeißnerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jena University Hospital · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDetermination of the procedure-specific, risk-adjusted probability of nausea.

designCross-sectional analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcome data. We used a logistic regression model with type of operation, age, sex, preoperative opioids, antiemetic prophylaxis, regional anaesthesia, and perioperative opioids as predictors of postoperative nausea.

settingData from 152 German and Austrian hospitals collected in the Quality Improvement in Postoperative Pain Treatment (QUIPS) registry from 2013 to 2022. Participants completed a validated outcome questionnaire on the first postoperative day. Operations were categorised into groups of at least 100 cases.

participantsWe included 78 231 of the 293 947 participants from the QUIPS registry. They were 18 years or older, willing and able to participate and could be assigned to exactly one operation group.

main outcome measuresAdjusted absolute risk of nausea on the first postoperative day for 72 types of operation.

resultsThe adjusted absolute risk of nausea ranged from 6.2% to 36.2% depending on the type of operation. The highest risks were found for laparoscopic bariatric operations (36.2%), open hysterectomy (30.4%), enterostoma relocation (29.8%), open radical prostatectomy (28.8%), laparoscopic colon resection (28.6%) and open sigmoidectomy (28%). In a logistic regression model, male sex (OR: 0.39, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.41, p<0.0001), perioperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis (0.73, 0.7 to 0.76, p<0.0001), intraoperative regional anaesthesia (0.88, 0.83 to 0.93, p<0.0001) and preoperative opioids for chronic pain (0.74, 0.68 to 0.81, p<0.0001) reduced the risk of nausea. Perioperative opioid use increased the OR up to 2.38 (2.17 to 2.61, p<0.0001).

conclusionsThe risk of postoperative nausea varies considerably between surgical procedures. Patients undergoing certain types of operation should receive special attention and targeted prevention strategies. Adding these findings to known predictive tools may raise awareness of the still unacceptably high incidence of nausea in certain patient groups. This may help to further reduce the prevalence of nausea. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00006153; German Clinical Trials Register; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00006153.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsPostoperative Nausea and VomitingAdolescentAdultAnalgesics, OpioidCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePostoperative PainAnalgesics, OpioidAntiemeticsANAESTHETICSPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresREGISTRIESRisk FactorsSURGERYSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38382957
PMCPMC10882331
OpenAlexW4392001690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.