Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38382726›Full record

ArticleClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2024

DNA Methylation Profiling Enables Accurate Classification of Nonductal Primary Pancreatic Neoplasms.

Anna Vera D Verschuur, Wenzel M Hackeng, Florine Westerbeke, Jamal K Benhamida, Olca Basturk, Pier Selenica, G Mihaela Raicu, I Quintus Molenaar, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, Lois A Daamen and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Anna Vera D VerschuurDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: annaveraverschuur@gmail.com.
Wenzel M HackengDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Florine WesterbekeDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jamal K BenhamidaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Olca BasturkDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Pier SelenicaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
G Mihaela RaicuDepartment of Pathology, St Antonius Hospital and Pathology DNA, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
I Quintus MolenaarDepartment of Pathology, St Antonius Hospital and Pathology DNA, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Hjalmar C van SantvoortDepartment of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Lois A DaamenDepartment of Surgery, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center and St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
David S KlimstraPaige.AI, New York, New York.
Shinichi YachidaDepartment of Cancer Genome Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Claudio LuchiniDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Aatur D SinghiDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Christoph GeisenbergerInstitute of Pathology, LMU University, Munich, Germany.
Lodewijk A A BrosensDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: l.a.a.brosens@umcutrecht.nl.
Utrecht University · NLMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLLMU Klinikum · DERadboud University Nijmegen · NLThe University of Osaka · JPUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

The Prognostic Significance and Mechanistic Determination of Chromatin Remodeling Biomarkers in Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine TumorR37CA263622 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Aatur Dilip Singhi · 2021 to 2026
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA263622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

aimsCytologic and histopathologic diagnosis of non-ductal pancreatic neoplasms can be challenging in daily clinical practice, whereas it is crucial for therapy and prognosis. The cancer methylome is successfully used as a diagnostic tool in other cancer entities. Here, we investigate if methylation profiling can improve the diagnostic work-up of pancreatic neoplasms.

methodsDNA methylation data were obtained for 301 primary tumors spanning 6 primary pancreatic neoplasms and 20 normal pancreas controls. Neural Network, Random Forest, and extreme gradient boosting machine learning models were trained to distinguish between tumor types. Methylation data of 29 nonpancreatic neoplasms (n = 3708) were used to develop an algorithm capable of detecting neoplasms of non-pancreatic origin.

resultsAfter benchmarking 3 state-of-the-art machine learning models, the random forest model emerged as the best classifier with 96.9% accuracy. All classifications received a probability score reflecting the confidence of the prediction. Increasing the score threshold improved the random forest classifier performance up to 100% with 87% of samples with scores surpassing the cutoff. Using a logistic regression model, detection of nonpancreatic neoplasms achieved an area under the curve of >0.99. Analysis of biopsy specimens showed concordant classification with their paired resection sample.

conclusionsPancreatic neoplasms can be classified with high accuracy based on DNA methylation signatures. Additionally, non-pancreatic neoplasms are identified with near perfect precision. In summary, methylation profiling can serve as a valuable adjunct in the diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms with minimal risk for misdiagnosis, even in the pre-operative setting.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAcinar Cell CarcinomaDNA MethylationPancreatic Ductal AdenocarcinomaPancreatic Neuroendocrine TumorPancreatoblastomaSolid Pseudopapillary NeoplasmsTumor Classification

Identifiers

PMID38382726
PMCPMC13482779
OpenAlexW4392785893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.