Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38381934›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of surgery2024

Survival and safety after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or upfront surgery for locally advanced colon cancer: meta-analysis.

Daniel Aliseda, Jorge Arredondo, Carlos Sánchez-Justicia, Alicia Alvarellos, Javier Rodríguez, Ignacio Matos, Fernando Rotellar, Jorge Baixauli, Carlos Pastor

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Surgery in Older Cancer Patients.Current oncology reports · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel AlisedaDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5025-6069
Jorge ArredondoDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8077-6092
Carlos Sánchez-JusticiaDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain.
Alicia AlvarellosDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain.
Javier RodríguezInstitute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Ignacio MatosInstitute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Fernando RotellarDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6557-0712
Jorge BaixauliDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain.
Carlos PastorDepartment of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Pamplona-Madrid, Spain.
Navarre Institute of Health Research · ESClinica Universidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly used to treat locally advanced (T3-4 Nx-2 M0) colon cancer due to its potential advantages over the standard approach of upfront surgery. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyse data from comparative studies to assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on oncological outcomes.

methodsA systematic review was conducted by searching the MEDLINE and Scopus databases. The search encompassed RCTs, propensity score-matched studies, and controlled prospective studies published up to 1 April 2023. As a primary objective, overall survival and disease-free survival were compared. As a secondary objective, perioperative morbidity, mortality, and complete resection were compared using the DerSimonian and Laird models.

resultsA total of seven studies comprising a total of 2120 patients were included. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a reduction in the hazard of recurrence (HR 0.73, 95% c.i. 0.59 to 0.90; P = 0.003) and death (HR 0.67, 95% c.i. 0.54 to 0.83; P < 0.001) compared with upfront surgery. Additionally, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with higher 5-year overall survival (79.9% versus 72.6%; P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (73.1% versus 64.5%; P = 0.028) rates. No significant differences were observed in perioperative mortality (OR 0.97, 95% c.i. 0.28 to 3.33), overall complications (OR 0.95, 95% c.i. 0.77 to 1.16), or anastomotic leakage/intra-abdominal abscess (OR 0.88, 95% c.i. 0.60 to 1.29). However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk of incomplete resection (OR 0.70, 95% c.i. 0.49 to 0.99).

conclusionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a reduced hazard of recurrence and death, as well as improved overall survival and disease-free survival rates, compared with upfront surgery in patients with locally advanced colon cancer.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyChemotherapy, AdjuvantColectomyDisease-Free SurvivalHumansSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID38381934
PMCPMC10881053
OpenAlexW4392006128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.