Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38381832›Full record

ArticleScience advances2024

Synthesis reveals approximately balanced biotic differentiation and homogenization.

Shane A Blowes, Brian McGill, Viviana Brambilla, Cher F Y Chow, Thore Engel, Ada Fontrodona-Eslava, Inês S Martins, Daniel McGlinn, Faye Moyes, Alban Sagouis and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Wavyleaf basketgrass (mSphere · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A practical guide to characterising ecological coexistence.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Arthropod species loss underpins biomass declines.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Shane A BlowesGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6310-3670
Brian McGillSchool of Biology and Ecology and Mitchell Center for Sustainability Solutions, University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA.
Viviana BrambillaCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0002-0560-4693
Cher F Y ChowCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0002-1020-8409
Thore EngelGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9245-4397
Ada Fontrodona-EslavaCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0001-7275-7174
Inês S MartinsCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0003-4328-7286
Daniel McGlinnDepartment of Biology, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2359-3526
Faye MoyesCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0001-9687-0593
Alban SagouisGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3827-1063
Hideyasu ShimadzuDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0919-8829
Roel van KlinkGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8125-1463
Wu-Bing XuGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6566-4452
Nicholas J GotelliDepartment of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5409-7456
Anne MagurranCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0002-0036-2795
Maria DornelasCentre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0003-2077-7055
Jonathan M ChaseGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5580-4303

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is commonly thought that the biodiversity crisis includes widespread declines in the spatial variation of species composition, called biotic homogenization. Using a typology relating homogenization and differentiation to local and regional diversity changes, we synthesize patterns across 461 metacommunities surveyed for 10 to 91 years, and 64 species checklists (13 to 500+ years). Across all datasets, we found that no change was the most common outcome, but with many instances of homogenization and differentiation. A weak homogenizing trend of a 0.3% increase in species shared among communities/year on average was driven by increased numbers of widespread (high occupancy) species and strongly associated with checklist data that have longer durations and large spatial scales. At smaller spatial and temporal scales, we show that homogenization and differentiation can be driven by changes in the number and spatial distributions of both rare and common species. The multiscale perspective introduced here can help identify scale-dependent drivers underpinning biotic differentiation and homogenization.

Indexed as

Biodiversity

Identifiers

PMID38381832
PMCPMC10881054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.