Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38381653›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2024

Entomopathogenic pseudomonads can share an insect host with entomopathogenic nematodes and their mutualistic bacteria.

Maria Zwyssig, Anna Spescha, Tabea Patt, Adrian Belosevic, Ricardo A R Machado, Alice Regaiolo, Christoph Keel, Monika Maurhofer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria ZwyssigPlant Pathology, Institute of Integrative Biology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Anna SpeschaPlant Pathology, Institute of Integrative Biology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Tabea PattPlant Pathology, Institute of Integrative Biology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Adrian BelosevicPlant Pathology, Institute of Integrative Biology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Ricardo A R MachadoExperimental Biology Research Group, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchatel, CH-2000 Neuchatel, Switzerland.
Alice RegaioloJohannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Institute of Molecular Physiology, Microbiology and Biotechnology, 55128 Mainz, Germany.
Christoph KeelDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Monika MaurhoferPlant Pathology, Institute of Integrative Biology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zurich, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
ETH Zurich · CHInstitute of Plant Biology · HUJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Neuchâtel · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 310030_184666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A promising strategy to overcome limitations in biological control of insect pests is the combined application of entomopathogenic pseudomonads (EPPs) and nematodes (EPNs) associated with mutualistic bacteria (NABs). Yet, little is known about interspecies interactions such as competition, coexistence, or even cooperation between these entomopathogens when they infect the same insect host. We investigated the dynamics of bacteria-bacteria interactions between the EPP Pseudomonas protegens CHA0 and the NAB Xenorhabdus bovienii SM5 isolated from the EPN Steinernema feltiae RS5. Bacterial populations were assessed over time in experimental systems of increasing complexity. In vitro, SM5 was outcompeted when CHA0 reached a certain cell density, resulting in the collapse of the SM5 population. In contrast, both bacteria were able to coexist upon haemolymph-injection into Galleria mellonella larvae, as found for three further EPP-NAB combinations. Finally, both bacteria were administered by natural infection routes i.e. orally for CHA0 and nematode-vectored for SM5 resulting in the addition of RS5 to the system. This did not alter bacterial coexistence nor did the presence of the EPP affect nematode reproductive success or progeny virulence. CHA0 benefited from RS5, probably by exploiting access routes formed by the nematodes penetrating the larval gut epithelium. Our results indicate that EPPs are able to share an insect host with EPNs and their mutualistic bacteria without major negative effects on the reproduction of any of the three entomopathogens or the fitness of the nematodes. This suggests that their combination is a promising strategy for biological insect pest control.

Indexed as

MothsRhabditidaAnimalsInsectaLarvaSymbiosisbiological controlcoexistencecoinfectionentomopathogenic nematodeshost-sharinginsecticidal pseudomonadsInterspecies interactionsnematode mutualistically associated bacteria

Identifiers

PMID38381653
PMCPMC10945363
OpenAlexW4394764436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.