Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38381499›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2024

Young Children and the Creation of a Digital Identity on Social Networking Sites: Scoping Review.

Valeska Berg, Diana Arabiat, Evalotte Morelius, Lisa Kervin, Maggie Zgambo, Suzanne Robinson, Mark Jenkins, Lisa Whitehead

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The awareness of sharenting in Italy: a pilot study.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Valeska BergSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2156-0969
Diana ArabiatSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2325-0398
Evalotte MoreliusSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3256-5407
Lisa KervinAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5433-7587
Maggie ZgamboSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8667-795X
Suzanne RobinsonSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2083-6983
Mark JenkinsSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4542-1768
Lisa WhiteheadSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6395-0279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited understanding of the concept of the digital identity of young children created through engagement on social networking sites.

objectiveThe objective of this scoping review was to identify key characteristics of the concept of digital identity for children from conception to the age of 8 years on social networking sites.

methodsThis scoping review was conducted using the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. The key databases searched were EBSCO, Web of Science, ProQuest ERIC, and Scopus. Gray literature sources (National Grey Literature Collection, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and Google Scholar) were also searched to identify unpublished studies. Articles were selected if they were published in English and reported data on the digital identity of children in relation to social networking sites.

resultsThe key terms used in the literature were sharenting, followed by digital footprints and children's identities. Our study revealed 2 approaches to the creation of digital identity: social digital identity and performative digital identity. The articles in this review most commonly used the term sharenting to describe the behavior parents engage in to create digital identities for children on social networking sites. Motivations to post information about children differed among parents; however, the most common reasons were to share with friends and family and create digital archives of childhood photos, termed social digital identity. The second motivation was categorized as performative digital identity. The risk of digital kidnapping and identity theft associated with the creation of digital identities also influenced parents' behaviors.

conclusionsThe creation of a digital identity for children is an emerging concept. Our review develops a deeper understanding of sharenting behaviors that can be used to better support parents and their children in creating a digital identity with children and awareness of the potential future impact. We recommend that future studies explore the perspectives of children as key stakeholders in the creation of their digital identity.

Indexed as

childrendigital identityperspectivesscoping reviewsharentingsocial networking sites

Identifiers

PMID38381499
PMCPMC10918551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.