ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024
A Comparative Study of Performance Between Federated Learning and Centralized Learning Using Pathological Image of Endometrial Cancer.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficient data consensus algorithm integrating FL and blockchain dynamic partition protocol PBFT.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Federated learning, an innovative artificial intelligence training method, offers a secure solution for institutions to collaboratively develop models without sharing raw data. This approach offers immense promise and is particularly advantageous for domains dealing with sensitive information, such as patient data. However, when confronted with a distributed data environment, challenges arise due to data paucity or inherent heterogeneity, potentially impacting the performance of federated learning models. Hence, scrutinizing the efficacy of this method in such intricate settings is indispensable. To address this, we harnessed pathological image datasets of endometrial cancer from four hospitals for training and evaluating the performance of a federated learning model and compared it with a centralized learning model. With optimal processing techniques (data augmentation, color normalization, and adaptive optimizer), federated learning exhibited lower precision but higher recall and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) than centralized learning. Hence, considering the critical importance of recall in the context of medical image processing, federated learning is demonstrated as a viable and applicable approach in this field, offering advantages in terms of both performance and data security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.