Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38381385›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

A Comparative Study of Performance Between Federated Learning and Centralized Learning Using Pathological Image of Endometrial Cancer.

Jong Chan Yeom, Jae Hoon Kim, Young Jae Kim, Jisup Kim, Kwang Gi Kim

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jong Chan Yeom *Department of Bio-health Medical Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0003-6275-094X
Jae Hoon Kim *Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6599-7065
Young Jae KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University, 191, Hambangmoe-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, 21936, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0443-0051
Jisup KimDepartment of Pathology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, 21565, Republic of Korea. jspath@gilhospital.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0742-5517
Kwang Gi KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University, 191, Hambangmoe-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, 21936, Korea. kimkg@gachon.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0001-9714-6038

Funding

Gachon University GCU-2022-202209640001National Research Foundation of Korea 2021R1A2B5B02001915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Federated learning, an innovative artificial intelligence training method, offers a secure solution for institutions to collaboratively develop models without sharing raw data. This approach offers immense promise and is particularly advantageous for domains dealing with sensitive information, such as patient data. However, when confronted with a distributed data environment, challenges arise due to data paucity or inherent heterogeneity, potentially impacting the performance of federated learning models. Hence, scrutinizing the efficacy of this method in such intricate settings is indispensable. To address this, we harnessed pathological image datasets of endometrial cancer from four hospitals for training and evaluating the performance of a federated learning model and compared it with a centralized learning model. With optimal processing techniques (data augmentation, color normalization, and adaptive optimizer), federated learning exhibited lower precision but higher recall and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) than centralized learning. Hence, considering the critical importance of recall in the context of medical image processing, federated learning is demonstrated as a viable and applicable approach in this field, offering advantages in terms of both performance and data security.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningDeep learningFederated learningPathologySegmentationWhole slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID38381385
PMCPMC11300724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.