ArticlePathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Challenges of automation in quantitative evaluation of liver biopsies : Automatic quantification of liver steatosis].
Article in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMetabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is a common disease that is diagnosed through manual evaluation of liver biopsies, an assessment that is subject to high interobserver variability (IBV). IBV can be reduced using automated methods.
objectivesMany existing computer-based methods do not accurately reflect what pathologists evaluate in practice. The goal is to demonstrate how these differences impact the prediction of hepatic steatosis. Additionally, IBV complicates algorithm validation. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty tissue sections were analyzed to detect steatosis, nuclei, and fibrosis. Data generated from automated image processing were used to predict steatosis grades. To investigate IBV, 18 liver biopsies were evaluated by multiple observers.
resultsArea-based approaches yielded more strongly correlated results than nucleus-based methods (⌀ Spearman rho [ρ] = 0.92 vs. 0.79). The inclusion of information regarding tissue composition reduced the average absolute error for both area- and nucleus-based predictions by 0.5% and 2.2%, respectively. Our final area-based algorithm, incorporating tissue structure information, achieved a high accuracy (80%) and strong correlation (⌀ Spearman ρ = 0.94) with manual evaluation.
conclusionThe automatic and deterministic evaluation of steatosis can be improved by integrating information about tissue composition and can serve to reduce the influence of IBV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.