Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38381179›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2024

Should we consider Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI) as a new diagnostic marker for rectal cancer?

Hilmi Yazici, Ayse Eren Kayaci, Halil Ibrahim Sevindi, Wafi Attaallah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hilmi YaziciMarmara Universitesi Pendik Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey. hilmiyazici@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7470-0518
Ayse Eren KayaciMarmara Universitesi Pendik Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey.
Halil Ibrahim SevindiMarmara Universitesi Pendik Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey.
Wafi AttaallahMarmara Universitesi Pendik Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI), which depends on peripheral neutrophil, monocyte, and lymphocyte count, was found to be an effective prognostic indicator for various malignancies. In this study, we aimed to investigate the diagnostic value and the prognostic impact of SIRI on rectal cancer patients.

methodThe medical records of patients underwent sphincter-sparing rectal cancer surgery at general surgery between 2017 and 2022 were examined retrospectively. Patient demographics, operation types, neoadjuvant chemo/radiotherapies, pathological results, and complications were recorded. A total number of 99 patients who operated with diagnoses other than cancer were conducted as a control group. SIRI was calculated from preoperative peripheral blood samples' neutrophil, lymphocyte, and monocyte count. The optimal cut-off value for SIRI was found to be 1.38. The clinicopathological outcomes and Overall Survival (OS) were analyzed under two groups according to the SIRI values lower or higher than 1.38.

resultsThe number of eligible patients was 104. The median age of the entire cohort was 62 (31-89). The median follow-up time was 33 (1-62) months. The median SIRI value in the study group was significantly higher compared with the control group. The study group was examined under two groups: SIRI 1.38 and SIRI > 1.38. The male gender was significantly more frequent in the high SIRI group. The remaining patient demographics and operation types were similar between the groups. The pathological outcomes were similar between the two groups. Overall Survival rate was better in the low SIRI group than those higher. The higher group had significantly higher complication rates than the lower SIRI group (p: 0.004).

conclusionSIRI may be a valuable diagnostic marker in rectal cancer patients. Higher SIRI levels were also associated with poorer prognosis and increased complication rates. Still, further prospective studies with a larger number of patients are needed.

Indexed as

ComplicationInflammationOverallRectal surgerySurvival

Identifiers

PMID38381179
PMCPMC10881451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.