ArticleJournal of neurology2024
RFC1 repeat expansions in downbeat nystagmus syndromes: frequency and phenotypic profile.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07709143 (The Clinical Trial Protocol), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Clinical Trial Protocol: MRI Performance and Risk Factors of Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction: A Multi-center Cross-sectional Study
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Best Oculomotor Endpoints for Clinical Trials in Hereditary Ataxias: A Systematic Review and Consensus by the Ataxia Global Initiative Working Group on Digital‑Motor Biomarkers.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Patient-Reported Visual Function in Ataxias and Association with Clinical Oculomotor Findings.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- [Vertigo and oculomotor disorders: diagnosis, anatomical classification and etiology].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Oculomotor abnormalities in patients with cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, vestibular areflexia syndrome (CANVAS) reflect midline cerebellar impairment.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in the Genetics of Ataxias: An Update on Novel Autosomal Dominant Repeat Expansions.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Vestibular Loss and Cerebellar Ataxia: A Practical Approach.Ear and hearingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe cause of downbeat nystagmus (DBN) remains unknown in a substantial number of patients ("idiopathic"), although intronic GAA expansions in FGF14 have recently been shown to account for almost 50% of yet idiopathic cases. Here, we hypothesized that biallelic RFC1 expansions may also represent a recurrent cause of DBN syndrome.
methodsWe genotyped the RFC1 repeat and performed in-depth phenotyping in 203 patients with DBN, including 65 patients with idiopathic DBN, 102 patients carrying an FGF14 GAA expansion, and 36 patients with presumed secondary DBN.
resultsBiallelic RFC1 AAGGG expansions were identified in 15/65 patients with idiopathic DBN (23%). None of the 102 GAA-FGF14-positive patients, but 2/36 (6%) of patients with presumed secondary DBN carried biallelic RFC1 expansions. The DBN syndrome in RFC1-positive patients was characterized by additional cerebellar impairment in 100% (15/15), bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP) in 100% (15/15), and polyneuropathy in 80% (12/15) of cases. Compared to GAA-FGF14-positive and genetically unexplained patients, RFC1-positive patients had significantly more frequent neuropathic features on examination and BVP. Furthermore, vestibular function, as measured by the video head impulse test, was significantly more impaired in RFC1-positive patients. DISCUSSION: Biallelic RFC1 expansions are a common monogenic cause of DBN syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.