ReviewAnnals of hematology2024
Recent progress in chimeric antigen receptor therapy for acute myeloid leukemia.
Review in Annals of hematology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- CLL-1: An emerging target for immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Next-generation CAR-T and CAR-NK cell therapies in hematologic malignancies: engineering for persistence, specificity, and safety.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Overcoming therapeutic challenges in acute myeloid leukemia: active targeting strategies by nano-drug delivery systems.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Emerging strategies in CAR-T cell therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: overcoming heterogeneity and improving safety through dual-antigen targeting.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- CAR T-cells for acute leukemias in children: current status, challenges, and future directions.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2025Review
- Drug-tolerant persister cells in acute myeloid leukemia: pressing challenge and promising new strategies for treatment.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- The Immune Resistance Signature of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Current Immunotherapy Strategies.Cancers · 2024Review
- CAR-T lymphocyte-based cell therapies; mechanistic substantiation, applications and biosafety enhancement with suicide genes: new opportunities to melt side effects.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although CAR-T cell therapy has been particularly successful as a treatment for B cell malignancies, effectively treating acute myeloid leukemia with CAR remains a greater challenge. Multiple preclinical studies and clinical trials are underway, including on AML-related surface markers that CAR-T cells can target, such as CD123, CD33, NKG2D, CLL1, CD7, FLT3, Lewis Y and CD70, all of which provide opportunities for developing CAR-T therapies with improved specificity and efficacy. We also explored specific strategies for CAR-T cell treatment of AML, including immune checkpoints, suicide genes, dual targeting, genomic tools and the potential for universal CAR. In addition, CAR-T cell therapy for AML still has certain risks and challenges, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and haematotoxicity. Despite these challenges, as a new targeting method for AML treatment, CAR-T cell therapy still has great prospects. Ongoing research aims to further optimize this treatment mode.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38381173What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.