Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38381144›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2024

Automatic generation of conclusions from neuroradiology MRI reports through natural language processing.

Pilar López-Úbeda, Teodoro Martín-Noguerol, Jorge Escartín, Antonio Luna

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Lexomics, or why to extract relevant information from radiology reports through LLMs.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pilar López-ÚbedaNLP Department, HT Medica, Carmelo Torres 2, 23007, Jaén, Spain.
Teodoro Martín-NoguerolRadiology Department, MRI Unit, HT Medica, Carmelo Torres 2, 23007, Jaén, Spain. t.martin.f@htime.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7200-5028
Jorge EscartínDiagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, HT Medica, Paseo de La Victoria S/N, 14004, Córdoba, Spain.
Antonio LunaRadiology Department, MRI Unit, HT Medica, Carmelo Torres 2, 23007, Jaén, Spain.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PTQ2021-012120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe conclusion section of a radiology report is crucial for summarizing the primary radiological findings in natural language and essential for communicating results to clinicians. However, creating these summaries is time-consuming, repetitive, and prone to variability and errors among different radiologists. To address these issues, we evaluated a fine-tuned Text-To-Text Transfer Transformer (T5) model for abstractive summarization to automatically generate conclusions for neuroradiology MRI reports in a low-resource language.

methodsWe retrospectively applied our method to a dataset of 232,425 neuroradiology MRI reports in Spanish. We compared various pre-trained T5 models, including multilingual T5 and those newly adapted for Spanish. For precise evaluation, we employed BLEU, METEOR, ROUGE-L, CIDEr, and cosine similarity metrics alongside expert radiologist assessments.

resultsThe findings are promising, with the models specifically fine-tuned for neuroradiology MRI achieving scores of 0.46, 0.28, 0.52, 2.45, and 0.87 in the BLEU-1, METEOR, ROUGE-L, CIDEr, and cosine similarity metrics, respectively. In the radiological experts' evaluation, they found that in 75% of the cases evaluated, the conclusions generated by the system were as good as or even better than the manually generated conclusions.

conclusionThe methods demonstrate the potential and effectiveness of customizing state-of-the-art pre-trained models for neuroradiology, yielding automatic MRI report conclusions that nearly match expert quality. Furthermore, these results underscore the importance of designing and pre-training a dedicated language model for radiology report summarization.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingRadiologyHumansLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesInformaticsMachine learningNatural language processingNeuroradiologyText summarization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.