Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38380975›Full record

Trial reportActa dermato-venereologica2024

Efficacy of Spironolactone Compared with Doxycycline in Moderate Acne in Adult Females: Results of the Multicentre, Controlled, Randomized, Double-blind Prospective and Parallel Female Acne Spironolactone vs doxyCycline Efficacy (FASCE) Study.

Brigitte Dréno, Jean-Michel Nguyen, Ewa Hainaut, Laurent Machet, Marie-Thérèse Leccia, Nathalie Beneton, Jean-Paul Claudel, Philippe Célérier, Marie Le Moigne, Sarah Le Naour and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Acne vulgaris: a clinical update.Australian prescriber · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Acne tarda: Recommendations for classification, treatment and care as a result of an expert discussion.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Obesity: A Modulator in Acne Management.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Efficacy and Safety of Hormonal Therapies for Acne: A Narrative Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Brigitte DrénoNantes Université, INSERM, CNRS, Immunology and New Concepts in ImmunoTherapy, INCIT, UMR 1302/EMR6001, Nantes, France. brigitte.dreno@atlanmed.fr.
Jean-Michel NguyenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Ewa HainautDepartment of Dermatology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
Laurent MachetDepartment of Dermatology, CHU Tours, INSERM U1253, University of Tours, Tours, France.
Marie-Thérèse LecciaDepartment of Dermatology, Allergology and Photobiology, CHU A. Michallon, Grenoble, France.
Nathalie BenetonDepartment of Dermatology, Le Mans Hospital, Le Mans, France.
Jean-Paul ClaudelPrivate Practice, Tours, France.
Philippe CélérierDepartment of Dermatology, CHR La Rochelle, La Rochelle, France.
Marie Le MoigneDepartment of Dermatology, Nantes University, CHU Nantes, CIC1413, Nantes, France.
Sarah Le NaourDepartment of Dermatology, Nantes University, CHU Nantes, CIC1413, Nantes, France.
Florence VrignaudClinical Investigation Centre CIC1413, CHU Nantes and INSERM, Nantes, France; Nantes University, CHU Nantes, UTCG, Nantes, France.
Alexandra PoinasClinical Investigation Centre CIC1413, CHU Nantes and INSERM, Nantes, France.
Cécile DertHealth Economics Studies and Development of Health Products, Department of Partnership and Innovation, CHU Nantes, Nantes University, Nantes, France.
Aurélie BoisrobertDepartment of Dermatology, Nantes University, CHU Nantes, CIC1413, Nantes, France.
Laurent FletDepartment of Pharmacy, CHU Nantes, Nantes University, Nantes, France.
Simon KornerVigilances Unit, Department of Research and Innovation, CHU Nantes, Nantes University, Nantes, France.
Amir KhammariNantes Université, INSERM, CNRS, Immunology and New Concepts in ImmunoTherapy, INCIT, UMR 1302/EMR6001, Nantes, France; Department of Dermatology, Nantes University, CHU Nantes, CIC1413, Nantes, France.
Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Nantes · FRNantes Université · FRCentre Hospitalier de La Rochelle · FRCentre Hospitalier du Mans · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHôpital Albert Michallon · FRImmunologie et Nouveaux Concepts en ImmunothérapieUniversité de Poitiers · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acne in adult females is triggered mainly by hormones. Doxycycline is a reference treatment in acne. Spironolactone targets the androgen receptor of sebaceous glands and is prescribed off-label for female adult acne. This multicentre, controlled, randomized, double-blind prospective and parallel study assessed the efficacy of spironolactone compared with doxycycline in adult female acne. A total of 133 women with moderate acne were randomized to receive treatment with: (i) doxycycline and benzoyl peroxide for 3 months followed by a 3-month treatment with its placebo and benzoyl peroxide, or (ii) spironolactone and benzoyl peroxide for 6 months. Successfully treated patients continued with benzoyl peroxide or spironolactone alone for a further 6 months. Primary endpoints were treatment success at month 4 and month 6 with the AFAST score. At all visits, the ECLA score, lesion counts, local and systemic safety and quality of life were assessed. Spironolactone performed better at month 4 and showed a statistically significant better treatment success after 6 months than doxycycline (p = 0.007). Spironolactone was 1.37-times and 2.87-times more successful compared with doxycycline at respective time-points. AFAST and ECLA scores, as well as lesion counts always improved more with spironolactone. Patients' quality of life was better with spironolactone at month 4 and month 6. Spironolactone was very well tolerated. This is the first study to show that, in female adults with moderate acne, treatment with spironolactone is significantly more successful than doxycycline and very well tolerated.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisDoxycyclineAdultBenzoyl PeroxideDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSpironolactoneTreatment OutcomeBenzoyl PeroxideDoxycyclineSpironolactone

Identifiers

PMID38380975
PMCPMC10910526
OpenAlexW4391995723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.