Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38380837›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2024

Design and baseline characteristics of SALT-HF trial: hypertonic saline therapy in ambulatory heart failure.

M Cobo Marcos, J Comín-Colet, R de la Espriella, J Rubio Gracia, J L Morales-Rull, I Zegrí, P Llacer, P Diez-Villanueva, S Jiménez-Marrero, J de Juan Bagudá and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Diuretic Use in Heart Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Combinational Diuretics in Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2024
    Review
  7. Diuretic in Decompensated Heart Failure: With or Without Salt?Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

M Cobo MarcosDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
J Comín-ColetCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER Cardiovascular), Madrid, Spain.
R de la EspriellaDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia (INCLIVA), University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
J Rubio GraciaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Lozano Blesa, University of Zaragoza, Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragon), Zaragoza, Spain.
J L Morales-RullDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain.
I ZegríDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
P LlacerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.
P Diez-VillanuevaDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
S Jiménez-MarreroDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain.
J de Juan BagudáCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER Cardiovascular), Madrid, Spain.
C Ortiz CortésDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario San Pedro de Alcántara, Cáceres, Spain.
J Goirigolzarri-ArtazaDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
J M García-PinillaDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.
E BarriosDepartment of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos Móstoles, Madrid, Spain.
S Del Prado DíazCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER Cardiovascular), Madrid, Spain.
E Montero HernándezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
M Sanchez-MartelesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Lozano Blesa, University of Zaragoza, Aragon Health Research Institute (IIS Aragon), Zaragoza, Spain.
J NuñezCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER Cardiovascular), Madrid, Spain.

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI20/00689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsHypertonic saline solution (HSS) plus intravenous (IV) loop diuretic appears to enhance the diuretic response in patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF). The efficacy and safety of this therapy in the ambulatory setting have not been evaluated. We aimed to describe the design and baseline characteristics of the SALT-HF trial participants. METHODS AND

results'Efficacy of Saline Hypertonic Therapy in Ambulatory Patients with HF' (SALT-HF) trial was a multicenter, double-blinded, and randomized study involving ambulatory patients who experienced worsening heart failure (WHF) without criteria for hospitalization. Enrolled patients had to present at least two signs of volume overload, use ≥ 80 mg of oral furosemide daily, and have elevated natriuretic peptides. Patients were randomized 1:1 to treatment with a 1-h infusion of IV furosemide plus HSS (2.6-3.4% NaCl depending on plasmatic sodium levels) versus a 1-h infusion of IV furosemide at the same dose (125-250 mg, depending on basal loop diuretic dose). Clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters were collected at baseline and after 7 days, and a telephone visit was planned after 30 days. The primary endpoint was 3-h diuresis after treatment started. Secondary endpoints included (a) 7-day changes in congestion data, (b) 7-day changes in kidney function and electrolytes, (c) 30-day clinical events (need of IV diuretic, HF hospitalization, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality or HF-hospitalization).

resultsA total of 167 participants [median age, 81 years; interquartile range (IQR), 73-87, 30.5% females] were randomized across 13 sites between December 2020 and March 2023. Half of the participants (n = 82) had an ejection fraction >50%. Most patients showed a high burden of comorbidities, with a median Charlson index of 3 (IQR: 2-4). Common co-morbidities included diabetes mellitus (41%, n = 69), atrial fibrillation (80%, n = 134), and chronic kidney disease (64%, n = 107). Patients exhibited a poor functional NYHA class (69% presenting NYHA III) and several signs of congestion. The mean composite congestion score was 4.3 (standard deviation: 1.7). Ninety per cent of the patients (n = 151) presented oedema and jugular engorgement, and 71% (n = 118) showed lung B lines assessed by ultrasound. Median inferior vena cava diameter was 23 mm, (IQR: 21-25), and plasmatic levels of N-terminal-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) and antigen carbohydrate 125 (CA125) were increased (median NT-proBNP 4969 pg/mL, IQR: 2508-9328; median CA125 46 U/L, IQR: 20-114).

conclusionsSALT-HF trial randomized 167 ambulatory patients with WHF and will determine whether an infusion of hypertonic saline therapy plus furosemide increases diuresis and improves decongestion compared to equivalent furosemide administration alone.

Indexed as

Heart FailureAgedAmbulatory CareDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFurosemideHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSaline Solution, HypertonicStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeFurosemideSaline Solution, HypertonicDiuretic resistanceHypertonic saline solutionHypertonic therapyOutpatient with heart failure

Identifiers

PMID38380837
PMCPMC11098644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.