Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38380549›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024

From Basic Science to Clinical Practice: A Review of Current Periodontal/Mucogingival Regenerative Biomaterials.

Angela De Lauretis, Øystein Øvrebø, Mario Romandini, Ståle Petter Lyngstadaas, Filippo Rossi, Håvard Jostein Haugen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bone Grafts: Everything You Need to Know.Journal of periodontal research · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Enamel matrix derivative and root coverage: A literature review.Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angela De LauretisDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0455, Norway.ORCID 0009-0001-5111-1398
Øystein ØvrebøDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0455, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9170-0202
Mario RomandiniDepartment of Periodontology, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0455, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5646-083X
Ståle Petter LyngstadaasDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0455, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6361-7644
Filippo RossiDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta", Politecnico di Milano, Milan, 20133, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2665-120X
Håvard Jostein HaugenDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0455, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6690-7233

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 327512Norges Forskningsråd 332148Norges Forskningsråd 346292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periodontitis is a dysbiosis-driven inflammatory disease affecting the tooth-supporting tissues, characterized by their progressive resorption, which can ultimately lead to tooth loss. A step-wise therapeutic approach is employed for periodontitis. After an initial behavioral and non-surgical phase, intra-bony or furcation defects may be amenable to regenerative procedures. This review discusses the regenerative technologies employed for periodontal regeneration, highlighting the current limitations and future research areas. The search, performed on the MEDLINE database, has identified the available biomaterials, including biologicals (autologous platelet concentrates, hydrogels), bone grafts (pure or putty), and membranes. Biologicals and bone grafts have been critically analyzed in terms of composition, mechanism of action, and clinical applications. Although a certain degree of periodontal regeneration is predictable in intra-bony and class II furcation defects, complete defect closure is hardly achieved. Moreover, treating class III furcation defects remains challenging. The key properties required for functional regeneration are discussed, and none of the commercially available biomaterials possess all the ideal characteristics. Therefore, research is needed to promote the advancement of more effective and targeted regenerative therapies for periodontitis. Lastly, improving the design and reporting of clinical studies is suggested by strictly adhering to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 statement.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsGuided Tissue Regeneration, PeriodontalPeriodontitisHumansRegenerative MedicineBiocompatible Materialsbone graftshydrogelsperiodontal regenerationplatelet concentratesputties

Identifiers

PMID38380549
PMCPMC11077667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.