Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38380387›Full record

ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2024

Use of Fibula Nails With Proximal and Distal Fixation.

Solangel Rodriguez-Materon, Samantha Trynz, Dino Fanfan, Jorge Fleites, Jorge Gil, Christopher Hodgkins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Solangel Rodriguez-MateronMiami Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Institute at Baptist Health South Florida, Coral Gables, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9546-1226
Samantha TrynzFlorida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0002-4614
Dino FanfanMiami Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Institute at Baptist Health South Florida, Coral Gables, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9617-4124
Jorge FleitesFlorida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Jorge GilMiami Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Institute at Baptist Health South Florida, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Christopher HodgkinsMiami Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Institute at Baptist Health South Florida, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Baptist Hospital of Miami · USFlorida International University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ankle fractures are a frequent injury in the adult population and a quarter of all ankle fractures are classified as unstable, requiring surgical intervention. Plate-and-screw construct is the traditionally used fixation method for fibula fractures. The use of an intramedullary nail is an alternative fixation method, with current literature supporting very low complication rates and hardware removal surgeries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes, including complication rates and implant removal rates, using a fibula nail with both proximal and distal fixation capabilities by an experienced surgeon. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 203 consecutive fibula nail cases from a single surgeon using a mini-open technique for anatomic reduction. Demographic, operative, clinical, and radiographic outcome data were analyzed, specifically examining complication rates and need for implant removal. Results: The average follow-up was 18.8 months (6-54 months). All fractures healed. We identified 2 cases of superficial wound infection, 1 superficial peroneal nerve irritation, and 1 case of implant removal. In the first 110 cases, 2 fractures were converted to a plate intraoperatively prior to a technique modification which has prevented this occurrence. No deep infection, delayed union, or nonunion occurred. Conclusion: Our data support that fibula nails with proximal and distal locking capabilities offer an alternative to plating with the potential for lower complication rates and lower need for implant removal. Level of evidence: Level IV, case series.

Indexed as

bimalleolarfibula nailFibuLocklateral malleolus fixationminimally invasive surgerytrimalleolar

Identifiers

PMID38380387
PMCPMC10878224
OpenAlexW4391973887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.